Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A token-efficient, immediately actionable skill body: concrete commands for every invocation mode, a conditional loop-status check, and a realistic output example table. The gaps are minor but real — unexplained path placeholders, a referenced script that is absent from the provided bundle, and no error-handling guidance for missing or unknown experiments.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: every section is a bare command block or output example ('python {skill_path}/scripts/log_results.py --dashboard', 'cat .autoresearch/{domain}/{name}/loop.json 2>/dev/null') with no concept explanations or padding. It clearly matches the anchor 'Lean and efficient; every token earns its place' and not the level below, which requires minor over-explanation that is absent here. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable and concrete: per-mode commands like 'python {skill_path}/scripts/log_results.py --experiment {domain}/{name}' and export invocations '--format csv --output results.csv', plus a concrete loop-status format template. It falls short of fully copy-paste ready because '{skill_path}', '{domain}', '{name}' placeholders must be substituted and the referenced 'scripts/log_results.py' is not present in the provided bundle, so the commands cannot be verified as executable — matching 'mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps' rather than the fully executable anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each invocation mode (single experiment, domain, full dashboard, export) has a clear command sequence, and the single-experiment flow includes a conditional checkpoint ('If loop.json exists, show: Active loop: every {interval} (cron ID: {id}, started: {date})') and the instruction 'For each experiment, also check for loop.json and show loop status'. It is below the level-5 anchor because there are no explicit validation or recovery steps for failure cases (e.g., unknown experiment name or script error), though as a read-only reporting skill the risk is low. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a compact, well-sectioned overview (Usage, What It Does, Output Example) that delegates logic one level deep to 'scripts/log_results.py' rather than inlining implementation. It does not reach 5 because no 'scripts/' directory exists in the bundle to verify that referenced path, and the '{skill_path}' placeholder convention is used without explanation — minor organization gaps per the level-4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |