Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered skill body: executable stdlib tooling, an explicit interview-phase workflow with confirmation and lint checkpoints, and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure. The gaps are minor — a few trimmable persona/metadata lines and the absence of an explicit failure-recovery loop when the linter or validation fails.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop for validation failures, e.g. 'If okf_linter reports violations: fix the flagged frontmatter/links, re-run okf_linter, and only then run index_generator' — this would lift workflow_clarity to the top anchor.
Trim the persona flourish, the blueprint metaphor, and the redundant footer version/language line; the frontmatter and portability blockquote already carry that metadata.
Consider a one-line fallback for when the scripts cannot be executed (the body covers 'without disk' for writing files, but not 'without Python' for the tooling).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely lean and imperative (numbered conformance rules, 10 terse principles, copy-paste commands) with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Falls to 4 rather than 5 due to minor trimmable padding: the persona flourish ('a senior chief of staff who combines in a single agent a business strategist, CFO, CMO, COO, and systems architect'), the metaphor 'you draw the blueprint before erecting the building', the portability blockquote, and the footer line that repeats frontmatter metadata. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance: three copy-paste-ready stdlib commands with flags ('python scripts/scaffold_bundle.py "My Company" --out ./my-company --has-product --has-tech', okf_linter, index_generator), a recommended flow, an exact phase order with explicit skip conditions ('06-produto (skip if pure service)'), and a numbered 'How to start' sequence. Matches the 5 anchor — commands cover the common cases end to end. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced workflow ('scaffold → interview per phase → write concepts → okf_linter → index_generator') with per-phase checkpoints: 'confirm and ask for "ok"', 'Stop and wait for the answers', and per-phase validation via okf_linter + index_generator. Falls short of 5 because there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop (nothing says what to do when okf_linter reports violations); it is above 3 since validation steps are present and explicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with details cleanly split into three one-level-deep, well-signaled references (okf_conformance.md, type_vocabulary.md, phase_playbook.md), each linked inline where relevant and enumerated with descriptions in a References section, plus assets and an example bundle. No bundle files were provided in the review package, so scoring is based on the body's reference structure alone, which matches the 5 anchor (clear overview, well-signaled references, easy navigation). | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |