board-deck-builder

Assembles comprehensive board and investor update decks by pulling perspectives from all C-suite roles. Use when preparing board meetings, investor updates, quarterly business reviews, or fundraising narratives. Covers structure, narrative framework, bad news delivery, and common mistakes.

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

—

The risk profile of this skill

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized, highly actionable skill body that mostly assumes Claude's competence and provides concrete worked examples. Its main weaknesses are a missing referenced template file, an implicit rather than explicit validation checkpoint, and minor content duplication with the reference file.

Suggestions

progressive_disclosure: The referenced templates/board-deck-template.md (cited in the References section and in frontmatter frameworks) does not exist in the bundle — either add the template file or remove the broken reference and the board-deck-template entry from frameworks.

workflow_clarity: Add an explicit pre-send validation checkpoint that converts the Common Mistakes table into a gated checklist (e.g., verify every metric has a target and status, every variance has a one-sentence cause, every ask is person-assigned).

conciseness: Consolidate the Delivering Bad News material with the overlapping How to Present Bad News section in references/deck-frameworks.md into one location to remove duplication.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly lean and directive with tight constraints ("3 sentences. No more.", "6-8 metrics max") and no padding of concepts Claude already knows, but the Delivering Bad News section overlaps with the same topic in references/deck-frameworks.md and a few aphoristic lines could be trimmed.	4 / 5
Actionability	Highly concrete, instruction-only guidance with copy-paste-ready worked examples (the Good executive summary, the metrics table, the ARR waterfall, the 5-step bad-news framework) and specific rules ("One sentence on each variance", forecast must have a confidence level) that cover the common cases.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Clear sequencing throughout (ordered 1-11 deck structure, 4-Act narrative, 5-step bad-news framework) and the Common Mistakes table functions as a checklist, but there is no explicit validate-before-send checkpoint or feedback loop in the build flow.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Good overall structure with SKILL.md as an overview and a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference (references/deck-frameworks.md) with detailed benchmarks appropriately split out, but the referenced templates/board-deck-template.md does not exist in the bundle, leaving a broken reference.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-structured description that clearly states both capability and trigger conditions in third person. It would benefit only from adding common synonyms (board deck, investor deck, board pack, QBR) to push trigger coverage to comprehensive.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and several concrete actions ("Assembles... decks by pulling perspectives from all C-suite roles", "Covers structure, narrative framework, bad news delivery, and common mistakes"), but the "Covers..." clause lists thematic areas rather than discrete executable actions like the 5 anchor.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ("Assembles comprehensive board and investor update decks by pulling perspectives from all C-suite roles") and when ("Use when preparing board meetings, investor updates, quarterly business reviews, or fundraising narratives") with concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural phrases users would say ("board meetings, investor updates, quarterly business reviews, fundraising narratives"), but omits common synonyms present in the body like "board deck", "investor deck", "board pack", and the "QBR" abbreviation, so coverage is good rather than comprehensive.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Targets a clear niche (C-suite-sourced board/investor decks) with distinct triggers that would not plausibly fire for unrelated skills, minimizing conflict risk.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Path: c-level-advisor/skills/board-deck-builder/SKILL.md
Commit: 19392f7

Reviewed: ~13 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.