Name: board-deck-builder
Rating: 67.2 (1 reviews)
Author: alirezarezvani

board-deck-builder

Assembles comprehensive board and investor update decks by pulling perspectives from all C-suite roles. Use when preparing board meetings, investor updates, quarterly business reviews, or fundraising narratives. Covers structure, narrative framework, bad news delivery, and common mistakes.

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is board-deck-builder in alirezarezvani/claude-skills

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, highly actionable instruction skill with a clear section sequence and review checklist. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: the SKILL.md points to reference and template files that are not bundled, leaving those references broken.

Suggestions

Add the missing `references/deck-frameworks.md` and `templates/board-deck-template.md` files (or remove the references) so the signaled navigation actually resolves.

Add an explicit per-section validation step (e.g., "verify each section has Headline → Data → Narrative → Ask/Next before finalizing") to lift workflow clarity toward a feedback-loop structure.

Trim editorial flavor lines such as "Boards see 10+ decks per quarter" and "Boards find out eventually" that restate motivation Claude can infer.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is largely lean — tables, bullets, and bold callouts with no concept explanations Claude doesn't already know. A few editorial flavor lines ("Boards see 10+ decks per quarter", "Boards find out eventually") carry signal but could be trimmed, keeping it just below the top anchor.	4 / 5
Actionability	Highly concrete and copy-paste ready for an instruction-only skill: per-section bullet specs, a real worked metrics table, good/bad exec-summary examples, the ARR waterfall structure, and a numbered bad-news framework with example phrases. As an instruction skill, absence of code is not penalized because the guidance is fully actionable.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear sequence is given (11 numbered sections in standard order plus the per-section Headline → Data → Narrative → Ask/Next pattern), and the Common Mistakes table functions as a post-build review checklist. Not a 5 because there is no explicit per-section validation checkpoint or build-then-verify loop, though the destructive-operations cap does not apply to this generation skill.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The body signals two one-level-deep references ("See `references/deck-frameworks.md`" and the References list pointing to `templates/board-deck-template.md`), but neither file exists — no references/ or templates/ directories are present, so navigation dead-ends. Scored against the actual (empty) bundle structure, the cross-file split is promised but not realized.	3 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that explicitly states both capability and usage triggers in third person with concrete natural-language terms. Minor room to tighten trigger synonyms and sharpen the action list.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	"Assembles comprehensive board and investor update decks by pulling perspectives from all C-suite roles" and "Covers structure, narrative framework, bad news delivery, and common mistakes" list several concrete actions and topic areas, with only minor coverage gaps. Not a 5 because the actions lean on "covers" topic enumeration rather than a fully comprehensive set of distinct operations.	4 / 5
Completeness	It explicitly answers both what ("Assembles comprehensive board and investor update decks...") and when ("Use when preparing board meetings, investor updates, quarterly business reviews, or fundraising narratives") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	"board meetings, investor updates, quarterly business reviews, or fundraising narratives" plus "board and investor update decks" give good natural-term coverage users would actually say. Not a 5 because common synonyms present in the body (board pack, QBR, investor relations) are absent from the description itself.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	"board and investor update decks" with triggers like QBR and fundraising narratives is a clear, mostly distinct niche. Not a 5 because "deck" as a term carries minor overlap risk with general presentation/pptx skills.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 2 missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Path: .gemini/skills/board-deck-builder/SKILL.md
Commit: 19392f7

Reviewed: ~2 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.