boardroom

/cs:boardroom <brief> — 6-phase multi-role deliberation across the C-suite with Phase 2 isolation, critic pre-screen, and synthesis. Outputs a board memo. Use when a decision spans multiple executive domains — e.g. a pricing change touching finance, positioning, and product, or a raise-vs-cut runway call.

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

—

The risk profile of this skill

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./c-level-agents/skills/boardroom/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured protocol skill with clear phased workflow and a concrete output template. The main weakness is conciseness — promotional framing and a competitor comparison table add tokens Claude does not need.

Suggestions

Remove the "Why This Beats gstack's Review Chain" comparison table and the "the heart of the plugin" framing; they are promotional padding rather than execution guidance.

Trim the "Why Phase 2 Isolation Matters" rationale explaining groupthink/anchoring — Claude already knows this — and keep only the operational instruction that Phase 2 positions must be produced independently.

Tighten the Workflow section by folding it into the 6-phase descriptions rather than restating the same steps twice, eliminating redundancy.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly efficient with clear phase and template sections, but includes unnecessary editorializing Claude does not need — "the heart of the plugin", the "Why This Beats gstack's Review Chain" comparison table, and a groupthink explanation in "Why Phase 2 Isolation Matters".	3 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete phase-by-phase guidance with actors (cs-cfo-advisor critiques the math) and a copy-ready board memo template; minor gaps in the actual advisor-invocation mechanism, but no code penalty applies for an instruction-only skill.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Clear 6-phase and 8-step sequences with checkpoints (critic pre-screen, devil's advocate pass, founder accept/modify/reject); not a destructive or batch operation so no cap applies, though explicit validate-then-proceed loops are absent.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized with clear section headers and a Related block linking one-level-deep to board-meeting, executive-mentor, and cs-chief-of-staff; no bundle files exist to split, and the inline memo template is reasonably placed.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly states both what the skill does and when to use it, with concrete cross-domain executive trigger examples. The only minor weakness is that the listed actions lean slightly abstract rather than fully concrete.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain and several concrete actions — "6-phase multi-role deliberation across the C-suite with Phase 2 isolation, critic pre-screen, and synthesis. Outputs a board memo" — but the actions (deliberation, pre-screen, synthesis) are somewhat abstract, so it falls short of fully comprehensive coverage.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ("Outputs a board memo") and when ("Use when a decision spans multiple executive domains — e.g. a pricing change...") with concrete trigger phrases, matching the top anchor.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural trigger phrases a user would say — "a decision spans multiple executive domains", "pricing change touching finance, positioning, and product", "raise-vs-cut runway call" — with good coverage, though a few synonyms/variants are missing.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Clear niche (C-suite multi-role boardroom deliberation) with distinct triggers (cross-domain executive decisions, runway calls) and minimal overlap with other skills.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
relative_links	Relative link issues: 3 suspicious	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Path: c-level-agents/skills/boardroom/SKILL.md
Commit: 19392f7

Reviewed: ~11 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.