Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured router body that maps request signals to concrete skill paths and gives an executable quick-start example. It is concise and navigable; actionability and workflow are strong but inherent to a delegating router.
Suggestions
Add a one-line note in the routing table on how to handle a request that matches no row (e.g., ask the user to clarify scope) to close the workflow gap.
Consider showing the clarifying-question step as an explicit example so the ambiguity checkpoint is concrete rather than only stated.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~28-line body is lean and efficient, assumes Claude's competence, and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete signal→skill→path routing table and copy-paste bash commands, but the router's own action is delegation, so the executable guidance is mostly rather than fully complete. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (match → clarify if multiple rows match → load subskill SKILL.md → follow its workflow) with an ambiguity checkpoint, though no explicit validation loop is needed for this non-destructive routing task. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (routing table, quick start, rules) with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references to each subskill path; under 50 lines with no unnecessary external references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |