Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable workflow for a non-trivial naming skill, with clear sequencing and a concrete output format. Its main weaknesses are some tightening opportunity in the prose and broken reference paths — the body cites two `references/*.md` files that are absent from the bundle.
Suggestions
Add the missing `references/naming-research.md` and `references/worked-examples.md` files (or remove the inline citations) so the well-signaled references actually resolve.
Tighten the Overview examples and the Step 3a feel-mapping list, which restate ideas already conveyed by the description and the checks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and assumes competence (it does not explain basic concepts like trademarks), but illustrative prose such as the Overview examples and the childcare/consultancy feel-mapping list in 3a could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific for an instruction-only skill — eight named checks with definitions, the three-constraint rule, the quality-bar rejection list, and a precise table format ("symbol plus 2-4 words") — with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (Gather → Run checks → Suggest → Present → Hand over) with the find-or-check gating question and the Step 5 verification checklist; feedback loops are present (3e reruns survivors through Step 2) but softer than explicit error-recovery loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are well-signaled and one-level-deep (line 48 specifies when to read each), but the referenced files `references/naming-research.md` and `references/worked-examples.md` do not exist in the bundle, breaking navigation, and a fair amount of detail is inlined. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |