CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

c-level-agents

Founder-mode executive team. 13 cs-* C-suite agents (CFO, CMO, CRO, CPO, COO, CHRO, CISO, GC, CDO, CAIO, CCO, VPE, Chief of Staff) and 21 /cs:* slash commands for forcing-question office hours, multi-role boardroom deliberation, strategic sprint pipeline, and meta routing. Use when the founder needs a virtual executive team, when invoking /cs:* commands, or when orchestrating multi-role decisions.

62

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./c-level-agents/skills/c-level-agents/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body works well as a compact index of the plugin: lean, runnable Quick Start, a clear command catalog, and a legible routing diagram. Its weaknesses are missing workflow checkpoints (no validation or error paths in the decision pipeline) and progressive disclosure that leans entirely on out-of-bundle, unverifiable reference paths.

Suggestions

Add validation checkpoints and error paths to the strategic pipeline — e.g., verify company-context.md exists before running reviews, and define what happens when boardroom deliberation surfaces blockers before /cs:decide commits a decision.

Move persona-voices.md and llm-wiki-bridge.md into the skill's own references/ directory (and use one-level-deep relative links) so the referenced material ships with and resolves inside the bundle.

Trim the '## Keywords' section and the duplicated version/date/status footer, which restate the frontmatter description and metadata without adding guidance.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is largely tight — a 4-line Quick Start, one-line command descriptions, a compact architecture diagram, and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Minor padding keeps it from anchor 5: the '## Keywords' section duplicates the description's trigger terms, and version/date/status are repeated in both frontmatter and the footer.

4 / 5

Actionability

The Quick Start provides runnable commands with arguments and comments ('/cs:onboard # populate company context first'), and every command in the catalog has a one-line scope. It falls short of anchor 5 because key mechanics stay unexpanded — no example artifact, and '6-phase deliberation (Phase 2 isolation)' and 'Bottom Line → ... → Your Decision' are named but never shown.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Sequences are present and readable (onboard first; '/cs:brief → /cs:boardroom → /cs:decide → /cs:execute → /cs:post-mortem'; the single-role vs multi-role routing diagram). But there are no validation checkpoints, gating conditions, or error/recovery paths anywhere — e.g., nothing on what happens if company context is missing or boardroom deliberation surfaces blockers — matching anchor 3 ('sequence present but checkpoints missing'), not anchor 4 ('most checkpoints present').

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is an overview pointing to detail, which is the right shape, but virtually all substance lives outside SKILL.md in unverifiable locations: the bundle contains no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories, and the cited paths escape the skill root ('../../references/persona-voices.md', '../../../CLAUDE.md', '../../../c-level-advisor/executive-mentor/'). References are signaled but structurally unresolved, matching anchor 3 rather than anchor 4's 'minor organization gaps'.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: it delivers a concrete, enumerated 'what' and an explicit multi-condition 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger terms. Its only weaknesses are category-level rather than action-level specificity and minor overlap risk with adjacent executive-advisory skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description enumerates concrete deliverables ('13 cs-* C-suite agents (CFO, CMO, CRO, ...) and 21 /cs:* slash commands') and named functions ('forcing-question office hours, multi-role boardroom deliberation, strategic sprint pipeline, and meta routing'). It lists several specific capabilities with minor gaps — the functions are category-level rather than fine-grained actions — so it fits anchor 4, not the comprehensive anchor 5, and is well above anchor 3.

4 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both questions: the 'what' is concrete (13 agents, 21 commands, four function categories) and the 'when' is explicit with concrete trigger phrases: 'Use when the founder needs a virtual executive team, when invoking /cs:* commands, or when orchestrating multi-role decisions.' This matches anchor 5, which requires clear and explicit what and when with concrete triggers.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases users would say are present: 'executive team', 'boardroom', 'office hours', 'founder', 'multi-role decisions', plus role names like CFO/CISO that map to common requests. A few natural synonyms are missing (e.g., 'leadership team', 'CEO advisor', 'strategic advisor'), placing it at anchor 4 rather than the comprehensive synonym coverage of anchor 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The '/cs:*' command namespace and founder/C-suite framing establish a clear niche with distinct triggers. However, 'virtual executive team' and 'executive' language could overlap with closely related advisory/coaching skills (the body itself references an executive-mentor sibling), so it fits 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk' rather than anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 4 suspicious

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

alirezarezvani/claude-skills

Path

c-level-agents/skills/c-level-agents/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.