capa-officer
Senior CAPA Officer specialist for managing Corrective and Preventive Actions within Quality Management Systems. Provides CAPA process management, root cause analysis, effectiveness verification, and continuous improvement coordination. Use for CAPA investigations, corrective action planning, preventive action implementation, and CAPA system optimization.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill capa-officerOverall
score
63%
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Discovery
90%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a solid skill description for a specialized quality management domain. It effectively uses domain-specific terminology that practitioners would naturally use, includes explicit 'Use for' guidance, and occupies a distinct niche. The main weakness is that the capabilities listed are somewhat abstract process terms rather than concrete deliverables or actions.
Suggestions
Replace abstract terms like 'CAPA process management' with concrete actions such as 'create CAPA investigation reports', 'document root cause findings', or 'track corrective action deadlines'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (CAPA/Quality Management) and lists several actions (root cause analysis, effectiveness verification, continuous improvement coordination), but these are somewhat abstract process terms rather than concrete specific actions like 'create CAPA reports' or 'document non-conformances'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (CAPA process management, root cause analysis, effectiveness verification, continuous improvement coordination) and when ('Use for CAPA investigations, corrective action planning, preventive action implementation, and CAPA system optimization'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong domain-specific trigger terms users would naturally say: 'CAPA', 'Corrective and Preventive Actions', 'root cause analysis', 'Quality Management Systems', 'corrective action', 'preventive action'. Good coverage of the specialized vocabulary in this domain. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | CAPA is a highly specialized quality management domain with distinct terminology. The specific focus on Corrective and Preventive Actions creates a clear niche that is unlikely to conflict with general quality or document management skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
35%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill reads more like a conceptual overview or training document than actionable guidance for Claude. It extensively describes CAPA processes, methodologies, and organizational structures but fails to provide concrete, executable instructions. The referenced scripts and guides could be valuable but their contents aren't shown, making the skill largely theoretical rather than practical.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable examples showing how Claude should actually perform CAPA tasks - e.g., a template for writing a 5 Why analysis with specific input/output format
Include actual code snippets from the referenced scripts or show example usage patterns rather than just listing script names
Add validation checkpoints with specific criteria - e.g., 'Before closing CAPA, verify: [checklist with measurable items]'
Reduce conceptual explanations (Claude knows what FMEA and Fishbone diagrams are) and replace with specific guidance on when and how to apply them in this context
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is moderately verbose with organizational structures and lists that Claude already understands conceptually. The ASCII tree diagrams and extensive categorization add bulk without providing novel, actionable information that Claude wouldn't already know about CAPA processes. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill is almost entirely descriptive rather than instructive. It lists concepts, categories, and frameworks but provides no executable code, specific commands, or concrete examples of how to actually perform CAPA tasks. The referenced scripts don't include actual code, just filenames. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are listed in logical sequences with numbered workflows, but there are no validation checkpoints, feedback loops, or explicit verification steps within the workflows. The 'Decision Point' notation is a good start but lacks concrete criteria for decision-making. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references external files (scripts/, references/, assets/) which is good structure, but the main content is still quite long and could benefit from moving detailed methodology descriptions to reference files. The references are clearly signaled but the core content is monolithic. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Validation
75%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 12 / 16 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
description_trigger_hint | Description may be missing an explicit 'when to use' trigger hint (e.g., 'Use when...') | Warning |
metadata_version | 'metadata' field is not a dictionary | Warning |
license_field | 'license' field is missing | Warning |
body_output_format | No obvious output/return/format terms detected; consider specifying expected outputs | Warning |
Total | 12 / 16 Passed | |
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.