CAPA system management for medical device QMS. Covers root cause analysis, corrective action planning, effectiveness verification, and CAPA metrics. Use for CAPA investigations, 5-Why analysis, fishbone diagrams, root cause determination, corrective action tracking, effectiveness verification, or CAPA program optimization.
99
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
99%
1.06xAverage score across 6 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly defines its domain (CAPA system management for medical device QMS), lists specific concrete capabilities, and includes an explicit 'Use for' clause with rich trigger terms. The description is concise, uses third-person voice appropriately, and would be easily distinguishable from other skills in a large skill library.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: root cause analysis, corrective action planning, effectiveness verification, CAPA metrics, 5-Why analysis, fishbone diagrams, corrective action tracking, and CAPA program optimization. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (CAPA system management covering root cause analysis, corrective action planning, effectiveness verification, and metrics) and 'when' (explicit 'Use for' clause listing specific trigger scenarios like CAPA investigations, 5-Why analysis, fishbone diagrams, etc.). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms a user in medical device QMS would use: 'CAPA', 'root cause analysis', '5-Why analysis', 'fishbone diagrams', 'corrective action tracking', 'effectiveness verification', 'CAPA investigations', and 'CAPA program optimization' are all terms practitioners would naturally use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with a clear niche in medical device QMS CAPA management. The specific domain terminology (CAPA, 5-Why, fishbone diagrams, effectiveness verification) makes it very unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
N/AReviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Something went wrong
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
967fe01
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.