cfo-review

/cs:cfo-review <plan> — Numerate-skeptic interrogation of any plan that touches money. Unit economics, runway, dilution, capital allocation. Use when a plan commits meaningful spend — e.g. a hiring wave, a fundraise decision, or a new channel budget.

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

—

The risk profile of this skill

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, highly actionable CFO review skill: concrete commands, numeric thresholds, a verdict system, and a complete output template. Its main weakness is structural — the executable scripts and several references point outside the skill's own bundle (no local references/, scripts/, or assets/ exist), creating a dependency on a sibling skill.

Suggestions

Move or vendor the three calculator scripts into this skill's own scripts/ directory (or reference them via a clearly documented prerequisite) so the workflow is self-contained.

Add a brief validation/consistency step to the Workflow (e.g. confirm every Numbers field is populated and the verdict matches the bear-case survival result before emitting the report).

Tighten a few explanatory bullets ('Above 2x is a problem', 'Default-alive is non-negotiable') into the threshold itself to save tokens without losing the rule.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean — bulleted questions with one-line definitions and crisp thresholds ('Burn multiple = Net burn ÷ Net new ARR', 'LTV / CAC > 3x is healthy') — but carries a few mildly explanatory lines ('Above 2x is a problem', 'Default-alive is non-negotiable') that could be trimmed.	4 / 5
Actionability	Provides copy-paste-ready bash commands (the three python scripts), quantitative pass/fail thresholds for every question, a tri-state verdict scheme, and a complete output-format template — covering the common cases concretely.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear three-step sequence (run the numbers → answer the six questions → apply the verdict) with the GREEN/YELLOW/RED decision acting as a checkpoint, but there is no explicit validation or fix-and-retry feedback loop; acceptable because this is an analytical review, not a destructive or batch operation.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized into clearly labeled sections (When to Run, Six CFO Questions, Workflow, Output Format, Routing, Related) with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references to an agent file and a sibling skill; however the runnable scripts live in another skill's bundle (../../../c-level-advisor/skills/cfo-advisor/scripts/) rather than this skill's own (absent) scripts/ directory, a minor placement gap.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that pairs a clear statement of what the skill does with an explicit 'Use when' trigger and concrete examples. Minor gaps: the capability list leans on financial domains rather than action verbs, and the broad money framing has slight overlap risk with sibling executive skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the core action ('Numerate-skeptic interrogation of any plan that touches money') plus four concrete analysis domains — 'Unit economics, runway, dilution, capital allocation' — giving broad coverage, though the enumerated items are financial domains rather than verb-form actions.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('interrogation of any plan that touches money' with the four financial lenses) and when ('Use when a plan commits meaningful spend — e.g. a hiring wave, a fundraise decision, or a new channel budget'), with concrete trigger phrases; voice is correctly third person.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	The 'Use when a plan commits meaningful spend — e.g. a hiring wave, a fundraise decision, or a new channel budget' clause supplies natural terms a leader would say (hiring wave, fundraise, channel budget, spend), but a few common synonyms (e.g. 'budget', 'runway', 'hire') are not stated verbatim.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The CFO numerate-skeptic niche is clearly framed and trigger-gated to money-touching plans, but 'any plan that touches money' is broad and could marginally overlap with sibling /cs: decision or boardroom skills.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
relative_links	Relative link issues: 2 suspicious	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Path: c-level-agents/skills/cfo-review/SKILL.md
Commit: 19392f7

Reviewed: ~11 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.