Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body dominated by executable commands, severity tables, and explicit workflow validation. Minor conciseness and reference-delegation gaps keep it just below maximum.
Suggestions
Move the full IAM/S3/SG check matrices into references/cspm-checks.md and keep only a representative subset inline to reduce token load and deepen progressive disclosure.
Trim the distinction-from-other-skills and provider coverage tables, or push them into the reference, since they are contextual rather than directly actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient table-driven layout with executable commands and minimal padding, though some explanatory prose (e.g., the distinction table and provider coverage matrix) could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste ready commands throughout — concrete CLI invocations, severity matrices, and a bad/good Terraform example — fully cover the common IAM, S3, SG, and IaC cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three clearly sequenced workflows with explicit validation checkpoints (exit code meanings, 'Exit code 2 = block deployment') and feedback loops for the CI/CD destructive/batch gating case. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with a table of contents and one-level-deep references to real files (references/cspm-checks.md, scripts/cloud_posture_check.py), though bulk check matrices are inlined rather than fully delegated to the reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |