CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

competitive-intel

Systematic competitor tracking that feeds CMO positioning, CRO battlecards, and CPO roadmap decisions. Use when analyzing competitors, building sales battlecards, tracking market moves, positioning against alternatives, or when user mentions competitive intelligence, competitive analysis, competitor research, battlecards, win/loss, or market positioning.

67

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is competitive-intel in alirezarezvani/claude-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, mostly lean intelligence playbook with concrete templates, thresholds, and a clear cadence-driven workflow. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: it references two external files that are not present in the bundle.

Suggestions

Ship the referenced `references/ci-playbook.md` and `templates/battlecard-template.md` (or remove the dangling references) so the in-body citations resolve to real files.

Trim editorial asides such as 'Not obsession — intelligence that drives real decisions' and 'Most companies do it too rarely' to tighten token efficiency.

Make the review/validation checkpoints in the cadence section explicit (e.g., a 'verify battlecard accuracy before publishing' step) to raise workflow clarity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Largely lean — tables and frameworks carry the content without over-explaining concepts Claude already knows — but a few editorial asides ('Not obsession — intelligence that drives real decisions', 'Most companies do it too rarely') could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, executable guidance: filled-in templates (threat matrix, tracking dimensions, feature-gap table), a specific win/loss question script, and quantified thresholds (>$50K ACV, 48-hour response) — minor gaps keep it just below copy-paste-ready.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The 5-Layer system and monthly/triggered/quarterly cadence give a clear sequenced process with time-bound checkpoints; because the work is advisory research rather than destructive or batch data operations, the validation-cap does not apply, though explicit review checkpoints are slightly implicit.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Structure is well-organized with a dedicated References section, but the body cites `templates/battlecard-template.md` and `references/ci-playbook.md` while no bundle directories or files exist, so the references are dangling and cannot resolve.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

91%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it states concrete deliverables for three C-suite roles, gives an explicit 'Use when' clause, and lists comprehensive natural trigger terms with synonyms. It uses correct third-person voice throughout.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete outputs — 'feeds CMO positioning, CRO battlecards, and CPO roadmap decisions' — with multiple specific deliverables, though the action verbs ('tracking', 'feeds') are slightly fewer than the comprehensive anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' ('Systematic competitor tracking that feeds...') and 'when' with a concrete 'Use when' clause listing trigger phrases, matching the anchor that clearly answers both.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural-language coverage including synonyms — 'competitive intelligence, competitive analysis, competitor research, battlecards, win/loss, or market positioning' — matching the terms a user would actually say.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (competitive intelligence) with distinct, specialized triggers; minor overlap risk with broad 'market research' or 'positioning' skills keeps it just below the minimal-conflict anchor.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.