CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

content-creator

Deprecated redirect skill that routes legacy 'content creator' requests to the correct specialist. Use when a user invokes 'content creator', asks to write a blog post, article, guide, or brand voice analysis (routes to content-production), or asks to plan content, build a topic cluster, or create a content calendar (routes to content-strategy). Does not handle requests directly — identifies user intent and redirects to content-production for writing/SEO/brand-voice tasks or content-strategy for planning tasks.

81

1.17x
Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

82%

1.17x

Average score across 6 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

The canonical home for this skill is content-creator in alirezarezvani/claude-skills

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized, appropriately short redirect body with clear intent-to-skill routing and a firm 'don't handle it here' directive. Its main weakness is redundancy — two tables say nearly the same thing — plus inconsistent coverage of the social-content route and no instruction for how the redirect should actually be performed.

Suggestions

Merge the 'Output Artifacts' table into the main routing table — they duplicate the same mappings and roughly double the routing information.

Add social-content to the 'Proactive Triggers' section (or remove it from the tables) so the routing coverage is consistent.

Specify the routing mechanism, e.g. 'tell the user to invoke /content-production' or 'load the content-production skill', so the redirect action is executable rather than implied.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The 'Output Artifacts' table repeats the first table's routing almost row-for-row ('Write a blog post' → content-production appears twice), and 'Why the Change' narrates rationale ('tried to do everything... jack of all trades') that a redirect skill does not need — mostly efficient but with clear tightening opportunities.

3 / 5

Actionability

As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, specific guidance: an intent→destination routing table, named tools (brand_voice_analyzer.py, seo_optimizer.py), and the directive 'Route the user to the correct specialist — don't attempt to handle the request here.' The one gap is that no mechanism for how to route (e.g., invoke the sibling skill or tell the user the command) is given.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The single action (identify intent → redirect) is largely unambiguous via the tables and 'Proactive Triggers', earning the simple-skill exception, but coverage is inconsistent: social-content appears only in one table row and is absent from Proactive Triggers, leaving minor gaps that keep it below 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines, no bundle files needed, well-organized sections with clear headers, and links to sibling skills (../content-production/, ../content-strategy/) are one level deep and clearly signaled — satisfying the under-50-lines guideline for a full score.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong redirect-skill description: it explicitly states what it does and when to use it with concrete, natural trigger phrases and named destination skills. It is slightly redundant (the final clause repeats the routing split already given parenthetically) and omits a few natural trigger variations and the social-content route.

Suggestions

Trim the redundant final clause ('Does not handle requests directly — identifies user intent and redirects...') since the routing split is already stated parenthetically in the trigger list.

Add the natural trigger variations the body already uses, e.g. 'content plan' or 'what should I write', to trigger_term_quality coverage.

Either mention the social-content route or explicitly scope it out so the description and body agree on coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names concrete actions ('routes legacy content creator requests to the correct specialist', 'identifies user intent and redirects to content-production... or content-strategy') with explicit destinations, but the action set is narrow and the final clause re-states earlier routing — minor gaps rather than comprehensive coverage.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Does not handle requests directly — identifies user intent and redirects...') and when ('Use when a user invokes content creator, asks to write a blog post... or asks to plan content, build a topic cluster, or create a content calendar') with concrete trigger phrases, despite mild redundancy in the final clause.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user phrases are well covered ('content creator', 'write a blog post, article, guide', 'brand voice analysis', 'plan content', 'build a topic cluster', 'create a content calendar'), but common variations the body itself uses ('content plan', 'what should I write') and any social-content phrasing are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The legacy 'content creator' name is a distinct trigger, but phrases like 'write a blog post' overlap with the successor skills it routes to, so it fires alongside closely related skills — minor overlap risk rather than a clear niche.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 5 suspicious

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

alirezarezvani/claude-skills

Path

.gemini/skills/content-creator/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.