Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clean, well-structured redirect body that makes routing decisions clear and points outward to the successor skills. Its main weakness is redundancy: the same routing mapping is repeated across three sections.
Suggestions
Collapse the 'Output Artifacts' table and 'Proactive Triggers' list into the single main routing table to remove the triple-stated routing logic and tighten conciseness.
Promote the social-content route into the same authoritative table and 'Related Skills' list so all destinations are covered consistently.
Replace the 'most likely intent is writing' soft default with an explicit decision rule (e.g., default to content-production only when no planning keyword is present) to remove routing ambiguity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The routing logic is stated three times — the main table, the 'Output Artifacts' table, and the 'Proactive Triggers' list — which is redundant padding, though each instance is itself lean. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete intent-to-destination decision table ('Write a blog post... -> content-production', 'Plan what content... -> content-strategy'), executable as a routing rule, with a minor gap: social-content routing appears in only one table. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single routing action is unambiguous and the simple-skill exception applies, but the overlapping routing tables and the 'most likely intent is writing' soft default introduce minor ambiguity about which presentation is authoritative. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with one-level-deep, clearly-signaled references to the successor skills via relative links; the body is appropriately an overview pointing to where the real content lives. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |