Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured instruction skill: the searchable-vs-shareable decision rule and proactive triggers are concrete and actionable, and detail is appropriately offloaded to the bundled reference and script. The main weaknesses are mild internal redundancy and a workflow that is sequenced implicitly by section order rather than as an explicit ordered procedure with checkpoints.
Suggestions
Merge the Task-Specific Questions section into the Before Planning customer-research checklist (or cut it) — its sales-call and pattern questions duplicate items already listed there.
Frame the planning flow as an explicit numbered procedure (gather context → classify searchable/shareable → prioritize topics → cluster map → produce output) with the tool-output review called out as a validation checkpoint.
Add one compact worked example of a prioritized topic row and a pillar/subtopic snippet so the Output Format sections are concrete rather than purely descriptive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is composed of lean bullet lists with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but there is redundant overlap: "What questions keep coming up in sales calls?" in Task-Specific Questions duplicates "What objections come up in sales calls?" in Before Planning, and the Output Artifacts table partially restates Output Format. This is anchor 4 (efficient with minor trims possible) rather than anchor 5 (every token earns its place) or anchor 3 (no unnecessary explanations). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable: a four-branch decision rule ("if it has no volume but a distribution hook → shareable"), copy-paste-ready script commands, and enumerated table columns ("keyword, volume, difficulty, buyer stage, content type, score"). It falls short of anchor 5 only because "Visual or structured representation of how content interconnects" is vague and no worked example of a prioritized topic or pillar is given. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is coherent and explicitly cued ("Check for product marketing context first", "Once priority topics exist, group them mechanically") with one verification checkpoint on tool output ("the tool groups lexically; you verify buyer-stage coherence"). Anchor 5 is not met because steps are not framed as an ordered procedure with feedback loops; anchor 3 is too low since checkpoints and sequencing are present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview structure with a well-signaled, verified one-level-deep reference ("Full treatment: references/content-strategy-reference.md") and documented executable use of the bundled script; the searchable-vs-shareable detail is correctly deferred rather than inlined, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |