Conciseness

The body is lean — no concept explanations, each dimension compressed to capture items plus one quoted probe — but includes trimmable redundancy: a "Keywords" section that duplicates trigger terms already in the frontmatter description, and the file path "~/.claude/company-context.md" stated in the Output section and repeated in a standalone "Context File Location" section. Not 5 because of these duplicated tokens; not 3 because there is no padding or explanation of things Claude already knows.

Actionability

Highly actionable instruction-only content: literal opening questions ("Tell me about the company in your own words — what are you building and why does it matter?"), a quoted key probe per dimension, exact output rules ("Write [not captured] for unknowns — never leave blank. Add timestamp, mark as fresh") and a scripted closing message. Not 5 because the output-generation step depends entirely on templates/company-context-template.md, which is not present in the bundle, so the final artifact's format can't be executed as written; not 3 because the interview flow itself is fully executable.

Workflow Clarity

Both flows are clearly sequenced: setup (scripted opener → 7 dimensions → generate file → scripted closing) and update (scripted opener → one 'what changed?' question per dimension → refresh timestamp, reset to fresh), with an inline validation habit ("Reflect back: 'So the real issue sounds like X — is that right?'") and a completeness rule. Not a destructive/batch operation, so no validation cap applies. Not 5 because there is no explicit end-of-interview checkpoint confirming all 7 dimensions were captured before generating the file.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well sectioned and ends with a clearly signaled one-level-deep References section (templates/company-context-template.md, references/interview-guide.md), but neither file exists in the bundle — the disclosure chain is broken at exactly the points where detail is supposed to live. Not 4 because dangling references are more than a minor organization gap; not 2 because the inline content is appropriately sized and nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined.

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions — "captures company context across 7 dimensions", "Invoke with /cs:setup for initial interview or /cs:update for quarterly refresh", "Generates ~/.claude/company-context.md used by all C-suite advisor skills" — with named commands and a concrete output artifact, in third person. Not 5 because coverage has minor gaps (e.g., that /cs:update rewrites/refreshes the existing file is only implied by "Generates"); not 3 because it goes well beyond 1-2 actions by naming commands, the output file, and its downstream consumers.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: what — "Founder onboarding interview that captures company context across 7 dimensions... Generates ~/.claude/company-context.md used by all C-suite advisor skills"; when — "Use when setting up the C-suite advisors for the first time, or when company context is missing or more than 90 days old — e.g. after a fundraise or pivot." Both are concrete and trigger-phrased, matching the 5 anchor rather than the 4 anchor's looser 'when'.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases a founder would say are present: "setting up the C-suite advisors for the first time", "company context is missing or more than 90 days old", "after a fundraise or pivot", plus "Founder onboarding interview" and "quarterly refresh". Not 5 because common synonyms (founder interview, company profile, onboarding) are not covered as natural variations; not 3 because the scenario-based triggers go beyond merely relevant keywords.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (founder onboarding feeding a C-suite advisor suite) with distinct triggers tied to named commands (/cs:setup, /cs:update) and a specific context file, so closely related skills would not collide. This matches the 5 anchor's 'clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk'.