Conciseness

The body is dense and opinionated with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows — behavioral anchors like "Decisions under €5K happen at team level, same day, no approval needed" earn their tokens. Not 5: there is trimmable redundancy — the "## Keywords" section ("culture, company culture, values, mission, vision...") duplicates frontmatter trigger terms, and "## Detailed References" repeats the two inline citations of `references/culture-playbook.md` and `templates/culture-code-template.md`. Not 3: these are minor instances, not 'some unnecessary explanation' spread through the content.

Actionability

For an instruction-only skill, guidance is copy-paste ready: concrete workshop questions ("What would be lost if we disappeared tomorrow?"), a behavioral-anchor table with specific examples, a decision threshold table ("< 50% | Crisis | Culture emergency — all-hands intervention"), and rituals with cadences ("Weekly all-hands (30 min): company update + one win + one learning"). Not 4: no material gaps — specific examples cover the common cases across all six frameworks.

Workflow Clarity

Frameworks are numbered in a coherent build→codify→measure→maintain lifecycle, each with internal checkpoints: the day-30 test ("How would a new hire know we actually live this on day 30?"), the promotion audit ("What did the last person who got promoted demonstrate?"), and quarterly cadence with score-band actions. Not 5: there is no explicit routing for which framework to start from given a user's request, so the top-level sequence is implicit rather than stated. Not 3: checkpoints are present within each framework, not missing or merely implicit.

Progressive Disclosure

References are clearly signaled, described, and one level deep ("See `references/culture-playbook.md` for survey design", "See `templates/culture-code-template.md` for a complete template"), and the body appropriately keeps bulk detail out. However, scoring against the actual bundle structure: neither `references/culture-playbook.md` nor `templates/culture-code-template.md` exists in the skill directory — the bundle contains only SKILL.md — so the disclosure chain is broken and a runtime read would fail. Not 4: missing referenced files are more than a 'minor organization gap'; not 2: the inline content is well-structured and references are prominently signaled, not buried.

Specificity

"Build, measure, and evolve company culture as operational behavior" plus "mission/vision/values workshops, values-to-behaviors translation, culture code creation, culture health assessment, and cultural rituals by stage" lists five concrete, named actions with comprehensive coverage. Written in third-person imperative voice matching the good examples. Not 4: the action list is comprehensive with no minor gaps in coverage, which is the anchor-5 distinction over 'minor gaps'.

Completeness

Explicitly answers 'what' ("Covers mission/vision/values workshops, values-to-behaviors translation, culture code creation, culture health assessment, and cultural rituals by stage") and 'when' ("Use when building company values, assessing culture health... or when user mentions culture, values, culture debt, founder culture, or culture code") with concrete trigger phrases. This matches the anchor-5 example pattern exactly; not 4: the 'when' clause is fully explicit and specific, not merely adequate.

Trigger Term Quality

Trigger clause includes natural phrases users would say: "building company values", "assessing culture health", "designing cultural rituals", "creating culture codes", "handling culture clashes", "culture debt, founder culture, or culture code". Not 5: a few natural terms are missing from the 'when' clause — users asking for a 'mission statement', 'vision', or 'culture survey' (concepts the skill covers) would not match; not 3: coverage goes well beyond 'some relevant keywords' with many synonyms and variations present.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The culture-leadership niche is clear and the what/when pairing is specific ("handling culture clashes... founder culture, or culture code"), far above the generic anchor-3 example. Not 5: the bare trigger "values" is a generic word that could overlap with ethics, decision-making, or personal-values skills — a minor overlap risk with closely related skills.