Conciseness

The body is almost entirely operational — tables of triggers, questions, tokens, and rules — and never explains concepts Claude already knows (it cites WCAG §1.4.3 rather than teaching contrast). Not 5: the 'Forcing-question library' section with book/canon citations and parts of the References list are editorial framing rather than tokens that earn their place for execution.

Actionability

Concrete, runnable guidance throughout: exact invocations ('python3 .../onboard.py --set brand.primary=#FF6B35 --set design_style=editorial', 'MARKDOWN_HTML_NO_CONFIG=1 python3 .../config_loader.py --show', 'python3 .../brand_palette_validator.py --primary "#FF6B35" --accent "#00D4AA"'), exit codes (3, 4), and a full 10-question key/default table. Not 5: most worked-example commands abbreviate the script path as '.../' after the full path is shown once, so the majority of the block is not literally copy-paste ready.

Workflow Clarity

The flow is explicit and validated end-to-end: a symptom→action 'When to invoke' table, then onboarding with hard-rule checkpoints — 'brand_palette_validator.validate() runs after every change…If either fails, onboard.py refuses to save (exit code 4) and tells the user to pick a darker primary…or override brand.text directly' — which is a validate→fix→retry feedback loop, plus a writability precheck (exit code 3) and a 'checked by every converter via config_loader.py before rendering' gate. Not 4: checkpoints and error-recovery paths are explicit, not merely implied.

Progressive Disclosure

The body itself is well-sectioned and appropriately lean, and it correctly points to assets/design_system_schema.json (a real file). But the actual bundle ships three reference files — references/design_token_canon.md, references/typography_pairing.md, references/wcag_accessibility.md — and none of them are mentioned or linked anywhere in the body, leaving them undiscoverable; the 'References' section instead lists external books and non-bundle paths. Not 4: this is not a minor organization gap but a whole class of provided material that is never signaled.

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions — 'Captures the user's brand identity once via a 10-question onboarding wizard', 'validates body-text and link contrast against WCAG 2.2 AA', 'derives 12 CSS custom properties in HSL space', 'Refuses to save if body-text contrast fails AA 4.5:1 or the output dir isn't writable' — with comprehensive, parameterized coverage of inputs, behavior, and failure modes. Not 4: there are no minor coverage gaps; even precedence order and the bypass env var are stated as concrete behaviors.

Completeness

Both questions are answered explicitly: the 'what' is a full action inventory (capture, validate, derive, store, refuse-on-failure) and the 'when' is stated twice — 'Use before any markdown-html conversion' and 'Triggers on first-run onboarding…on explicit reset' — with concrete trigger phrases. Not 4: the 'when' is not merely implied or generic; it names specific trigger events.

Trigger Term Quality

Quoted trigger phrases like 'set up the brand', 'configure markdown-html', 'run onboarding', 'reset the design system', 're-onboard' are natural user phrasings with good coverage. Not 5: common synonyms a user might actually say — 'branding', 'theme', 'change the colors', 'rebrand' — are absent, so coverage is good rather than comprehensive.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is clearly fenced to the markdown-html plugin ('stores the result for every markdown-html converter to consume', 'checked by every converter via config_loader.py'), so most triggers are distinct. Not 5: generic quoted phrases like 'set up the brand' and 'run onboarding' carry minor overlap risk with closely related brand/onboarding skills outside the markdown-html context.