Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and highly actionable, with concrete commands, clear mode selection, and a well-defined post-eval workflow. The main gaps are unspecified configuration sources for the eval command placeholders and no guidance for failure cases such as empty or failed evaluations.
Suggestions
Specify where the "configured criteria" ({eval_cmd}, {metric}, {direction}) come from — e.g., name the config file and its location — so metric mode can be run without guessing.
Add a brief failure path: what to do when a session has no results yet or the eval command fails, so the workflow includes a validation checkpoint.
Clarify how to determine {base_branch} and {agent_branch} in LLM judge mode, since the git diff command is currently the only place they appear and no source for these values is given.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: no concept explanations, no padding, and every section (usage, three eval modes with example output, after-eval state update and next steps) earns its place. The example output blocks are illustrative rather than explanatory filler. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: concrete commands ("python {skill_path}/scripts/result_ranker.py --session {session-id} ...", "git diff {base_branch}...{agent_branch}"), specific file paths (".agenthub/board/results/agent-{i}-result.md"), and copy-paste usage examples. Minor gaps: "{eval_cmd}"/"{metric}"/"{direction}" are said to come from "configured criteria" without saying where that configuration is found or what its defaults are. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear: mode selection (metric / LLM judge / --judge flag), evaluation, an explicit hybrid tie-break checkpoint ("If top agents are within 10% of each other"), then state update and user-facing next steps. It lacks validation for failure cases (no results, eval command fails), keeping it below the explicit-validation 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short (~80 line), single-purpose skill with well-organized sections and no content that belongs in separate files; the only external references are one-level-deep script invocations via {skill_path}. Per the simple-skill note, this matches the well-organized 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |