Conciseness

The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence — no explanations of what a DRI or risk register is, and the output template uses concrete inline placeholders ('e.g., Pricing rollout'). The 'Why 90 Days' rationale block is minor over-explanation that could be trimmed, keeping it just below a 5.

Actionability

Provides a complete, copy-paste-ready output-plan markdown template and a 7-step concrete workflow ('Decompose the chosen option into 3-6 workstreams', 'Reverse-engineer 12 weekly milestones from the checkpoint date'). Not a 5 because guidance relies on placeholders rather than a fully filled-in example covering common cases.

Workflow Clarity

Seven steps are clearly sequenced and concrete with an explicit deliverable path ('Save and notify DRIs'). This is a generative planning skill, not a destructive/batch operation, so the validation cap does not apply; the minor gap is the absence of an explicit completeness check (e.g. verify every week has a DRI) before saving, which holds it at 4 rather than 5.

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clear sections (Pipeline Position, Input, Output Plan Format, Workflow, Routing, Related) with one-level-deep cross-references to sibling skills and no nested reference chains. No bundle files exist, so structure is scored on the body alone; it is good but the large inline template could in principle be split, leaving it just shy of 5.

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions — 'Generate a 90-day execution plan with weekly milestones, DRIs, and check-in cadence' — naming the domain and specific deliverables. Falls short of 5 only because coverage is narrow to a single output type rather than a comprehensive multi-action set.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' ('Generate a 90-day execution plan with weekly milestones, DRIs, and check-in cadence from an approved decision') and 'when' ('Use when a logged decision needs to become an operating plan — e.g. turning an approved market-entry call into weekly milestones with DRIs'), with concrete trigger phrasing and an illustrative example.

Trigger Term Quality

Contains natural domain terms users would say — 'decision', 'execution plan', 'operating plan', 'weekly milestones', 'DRIs', 'check-in cadence' — plus a concrete example trigger ('turning an approved market-entry call into weekly milestones'). Not a 5 because a few common synonyms are absent and there are no file-extension-style discriminators.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche within the /cs: pipeline (post-/cs:decide) with a distinct trigger ('a logged decision needs to become an operating plan') that is unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, minimizing conflict risk.