Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-organized and largely actionable, with useful trigger tables and concrete defaults, but its referenced scripts and reference files do not exist in the bundle and its workflows lack explicit validation checkpoints. It is competent but would benefit from materializing the missing bundle and tightening the redundant Keywords section.
Suggestions
Materialize the referenced bundle — scripts/contract_risk_scanner.py, scripts/term_sheet_analyzer.py, and references/{contracts_playbook,ip_and_regulatory,term_sheet_decoder}.md — so the cited commands and links actually resolve.
Add explicit validation checkpoints to each workflow (e.g., after drafting counter-proposals, verify each counter-proposal addresses the flagged HIGH-risk clause before routing to outside counsel).
Remove or merge the '## Keywords' section, which duplicates the frontmatter trigger terms and adds tokens Claude does not need.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient (tight tables, bulleted defaults), but the standalone '## Keywords' section duplicates the frontmatter trigger terms and several parentheticals over-explain concepts Claude already knows ('Founders forget that contractors don't auto-assign IP'). | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands and specific defaults are present ('python scripts/contract_risk_scanner.py path/to/contract.txt', '1x non-participating is standard'), but the referenced scripts and references/*.md files do not actually exist in the bundle, so the guidance is incomplete rather than copy-paste ready. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four numbered workflows give a clear sequence, but they lack validation checkpoints for consequential operations (e.g., Workflow 1 moves from 'draft a counter-proposal' straight to 'bring to outside counsel' with no verify step), which caps the score. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is reasonable — overview, Quick Start, core responsibilities, then a References section signaling references/*.md — but the referenced bundle files are absent, so the disclosure is signaled rather than functional. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |