Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, largely actionable body for a simple skill: a concrete mktemp target, a clear section list, and a preserved no-duplication discipline. Its main weaknesses are the dangling reference to a missing companion file and cryptic tooling names that leave the Tooling section unusable as written.
Suggestions
Bundle references/companion_tooling.md (or inline its essential content) — the body links to it twice but the file is absent from the skill's bundle, leaving the Tooling section's deferred detail unreachable.
Explain or remove the opaque Tooling line ("Tools: template + dedup + recommender. Agent: `cs-handoff-author`. Command: `/cs:handoff`") — bare names with no usage guidance are not actionable; state when the agent should use each.
Trim the duplicated provenance metadata: the blockquote and the trailing Version/Derived footer repeat version and derivation info already recorded in the frontmatter.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence (a single concrete mktemp command plus terse section spec), but the provenance blockquote and footer lines duplicate version/derivation metadata already in the frontmatter, and the compressed Tooling line ("Tools: template + dedup + recommender") could be trimmed or clarified. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: "Save it to a path produced by `mktemp -t handoff-XXXXXX.md`", an explicit five-section structure, and a concrete argument-tailoring rule. Minor gaps remain — the Tooling section names tools, an agent (cs-handoff-author), and a command (/cs:handoff) without usage guidance, deferring to a companion file. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear in prose (create temp path, read before writing, produce the sectioned doc, tailor to arguments) and the task is non-destructive so heavy validation is unwarranted. Minor ambiguity comes from the unexplained cs-handoff-author / /cs:handoff options, leaving it just below the unambiguous single-action bar. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section organization is good, but the body defers tooling detail twice to references/companion_tooling.md and no such file exists in the bundle (no references/ directory at all). Navigation to the deferred content fails, which is a more than minor organization gap. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |