Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A solid, executable skill body with concrete commands, clear usage examples, and sensible follow-up guidance for a read-only status command. Its main weaknesses are token redundancy from a near-duplicate example output and unstated details like how to resolve the latest session ID or handle missing sessions.
Suggestions
Replace the second example output ("Example output for a content task") with a one-line note that board activity content varies by task type, reclaiming ~17 redundant lines.
Add a brief step showing how to resolve the latest session ID when the user does not supply one (e.g., the session_manager.py command or flag that lists/picks the latest session).
Add one line of error handling in "After Status" for the common failure cases: unknown session ID or no sessions yet.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The commands and section framing are lean, but the second example block ("Example output for a content task", ~17 lines) duplicates the first output's structure almost verbatim with only task text and board messages changed — a noticeable chunk that could be tightened to a one-line note. This is more than the "minor instances" of over-explanation required for score 4, but the rest is efficient so it is well above score 2. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | "python {skill_path}/scripts/session_manager.py --status {session-id}" and the two companion commands are concrete, near copy-paste ready, and the "After Status" section gives specific next-step suggestions. Minor gaps remain: no guidance on resolving the latest session ID when the user supplies none, and the {session-id} placeholder resolution is left implicit, keeping it below fully-executable score 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence of three concrete read-only commands, with a conditional follow-up section ("If all agents have posted results... / If some agents are still running...") acting as a lightweight checkpoint. It falls short of score 5 because there are no error-recovery steps (e.g., what to do if the session ID is not found or no sessions exist); it is above score 3 since the branching after-status guidance supplies implicit checkpoints and the read-only nature requires no destructive-operation validation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (Usage, What It Does, Output Format, After Status) with script references clearly signaled as one-level-deep paths under {skill_path}/scripts/, and nothing that should be split into separate reference files. Minor gaps: the scripts are referenced by path without any note of what each supports, and the redundant second example could live elsewhere or be condensed, so it does not reach the fully-polished score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |