Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured routing skill that is lean, actionable, and clearly sequenced, scoring solidly across all dimensions. Its main gaps are a referenced script that is not bundled and some restated content across adjacent sections.
Suggestions
Either ship scripts/campaign_tracker.py in a scripts/ bundle or remove the invocation reference so the only external path in the body is real.
Add an explicit feedback loop to the Quality Gate (e.g., 'If any box is unchecked, revise the output before presenting') to lift workflow_clarity.
Trim overlap between Proactive Triggers and the Routing Matrix — the triggers can simply point back to the matrix instead of restating routing decisions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean — the routing matrix, campaign sequences, and Quality Gate earn their tokens without explaining concepts Claude already knows — but sections like Proactive Triggers and Related Skills partly restate routing logic already in the matrix. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable for a router: the matrix maps concrete triggers to named skills with a 'NOT this' disambiguation column, and the tool invocation 'python3 scripts/campaign_tracker.py campaign.json' is concrete; held back only because the referenced script is not actually bundled. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-skill campaign sequences are clearly numbered (1-9 launch, 1-7 content, 1-6 CRO) with a Quality Gate checklist as a checkpoint, but there is no explicit 'if the gate fails, redo' feedback loop beyond the static checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file structure with clear section headers and tables, but the one external reference — scripts/campaign_tracker.py — does not exist in any bundle directory, a broken one-level-deep reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |