EU MDR 2017/745 compliance specialist for medical device classification, technical documentation, clinical evidence, and post-market surveillance. Covers Annex VIII classification rules, Annex II/III technical files, Annex XIV clinical evaluation, and EUDAMED integration.
85
70%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
96%
0.98xAverage score across 6 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./ra-qm-team/mdr-745-specialist/SKILL.mdSoftware device classification and compliance gap analysis
Software device type identified
100%
100%
MDCG 2019-11 referenced
100%
100%
Rule 11 applied
100%
100%
Condition severity assessed
100%
100%
Correct device class
100%
100%
Duration/invasiveness factors addressed
100%
100%
Classification rationale documented
100%
100%
Conformity assessment route stated
100%
100%
Gap analyzer tool used
100%
100%
Correct class used in gap analysis
100%
100%
Critical gaps identified
100%
100%
Technical documentation structure and clinical evidence strategy
Annex II structure
100%
100%
GSPR evidence linkage
100%
100%
Software GSPR 17 included
100%
28%
GSPR 10.1 and 10.2 included
85%
28%
PICO framework used
100%
100%
Multiple databases selected
100%
100%
Equivalence per MDCG 2020-5
100%
100%
CER structure completeness
86%
100%
Qualified evaluator requirements
100%
100%
ISO 14971 integration
100%
71%
Reproducible search documented
100%
100%
Data appraisal criteria included
100%
100%
Post-market surveillance system and UDI labeling requirements
PMS Article 84 plan
100%
100%
PMS system components
100%
100%
Annual PMS audit
100%
100%
2-day reporting timeline
100%
100%
10-day reporting timeline
100%
100%
15-day reporting timeline
100%
100%
Class IIb PSUR frequency
0%
100%
PMCF plan sections
87%
100%
PMCF Annex XIV Part B
100%
100%
UDI-DI and UDI-PI distinction
100%
100%
UDI-PI required for Class II+
100%
100%
AIDC and HRI both required
100%
100%
Issuing entity identified
100%
100%
Physical device classification and conformity route selection
Duration factor assessed
100%
100%
Invasiveness level assessed
100%
100%
Body system contact assessed
100%
100%
Active vs passive assessed
100%
100%
Rule 8 applied
100%
100%
Correct device class
100%
0%
Classification rationale documented
100%
100%
Conformity routes for class listed
100%
100%
QMS maturity considered
100%
100%
NB capacity/timeline considered
100%
100%
Gap analyzer tool used
100%
100%
Correct class in gap analysis
100%
100%
Clinical investigation planning and ethics committee submission
Article 61(4) cited
100%
100%
Novel technology basis
100%
100%
CIP objectives section
100%
100%
CIP study design section
100%
100%
CIP population section
100%
100%
CIP sample size section
100%
100%
CIP safety section
100%
100%
CIP analysis section
100%
100%
Ethics submission: CIP included
100%
100%
Ethics submission: Investigator's Brochure
100%
100%
Ethics submission: informed consent
100%
100%
Ethics submission: insurance
100%
100%
SAE reporting timeline 7-15 days
100%
100%
EUDAMED reporting channel
100%
100%
GCP reference
60%
100%
Notified Body selection and EUDAMED registration workflow
NB designation scope criterion
100%
100%
NB capacity criterion
100%
100%
NB geographic reach criterion
100%
100%
NB technical expertise criterion
100%
100%
NB fee structure criterion
100%
100%
EUDAMED Actor module
100%
100%
EUDAMED UDI/Device module
100%
100%
EUDAMED Vigilance module
100%
100%
EUDAMED Certificates module
100%
100%
UDI issuing entity named
100%
100%
UDI-DI and UDI-PI assigned
100%
100%
Pre-submission: technical documentation
100%
100%
Pre-submission: GSPR matrix
100%
100%
Pre-submission: CER
100%
100%
Pre-submission: QMS certification
80%
100%
Pre-submission: labeling and IFU
100%
100%
Pre-submission: declaration of conformity
100%
100%
967fe01
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.