Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with concrete questions, a copy-paste output template, and an explicit traffic-light validation gate. The only minor weakness is a few editorial asides in 'Why This Works' that slightly pad the token budget.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with no padding about what YC or office hours are, but the 'Why This Works' section and a few editorial bullets ('excitement is a tell', 'the obvious answer is usually wrong') are mild over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides six exact questions with concrete sub-criteria, a full copy-paste markdown output template, and a GREEN/YELLOW/RED decision rubric — fully executable, instruction-only guidance covering the common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (interrogate → founder answers all six in writing → produce brief → traffic-light assessment → route) with an explicit validation gate and feedback loops (YELLOW sharpens Q[N], RED halts), matching the anchor-5 'explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery'. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the self-contained body is organized into clear, well-signaled sections (When to Run, Six Questions, Output Format, Routing) with no nested references, qualifying for the simple-skill 5 per the scoring notes. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |