Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable framework with strong sequencing and a usable output template. The main weakness is moderate verbosity in the framing/tone sections that restates concepts Claude already knows.
Suggestions
Trim the 'Why Most Post-Mortems Fail' and 'Tone of Good Post-Mortems' sections to essentials; Claude already understands blameless retrospectives, so keep only the diagnostic guidance that shapes behavior.
Consider moving the worked good/bad 5-Whys and action-item examples into a references file, keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with the framework steps and output template inline.
Add a brief facilitation note for each step (e.g., who to involve, timebox) to close the minor actionability gaps in meeting execution.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient actionable framing, but the 'Why Most Post-Mortems Fail' and 'Tone of Good Post-Mortems' sections are essay-like and explain blameless-retrospective concepts Claude already knows, so they could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete 7-step framework, good/bad example pairs with named owners and dates, and a copy-paste output-format template; minor gaps in meeting-facilitation specifics. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven steps are clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints (the 'test for a good root cause' and the Step 7 verification date); not a destructive/batch operation, so the validation cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single well-organized file with clear section headers and no nested references; the output format and example library could optionally be split into reference files, but inlining is reasonable for this overview. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |