Comprehensive toolkit for product managers including RICE prioritization, customer interview analysis, PRD templates, discovery frameworks, and go-to-market strategies. Use for feature prioritization, user research synthesis, requirement documentation, and product strategy development.
78
63%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
86%
1.56xAverage score across 6 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./product-team/product-manager-toolkit/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
92%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong description that clearly lists specific capabilities and includes a 'Use for...' clause with natural trigger terms relevant to product management. Its main weakness is the extremely broad scope, which could cause overlap with more specialized skills in areas like user research, documentation, or strategy. The description would benefit from slightly narrowing its scope or more precisely delineating its boundaries.
Suggestions
Consider narrowing the scope or adding boundary language to reduce potential conflicts with adjacent skills (e.g., 'Not for general project management or engineering task tracking').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions and deliverables: RICE prioritization, customer interview analysis, PRD templates, discovery frameworks, go-to-market strategies, feature prioritization, user research synthesis, and requirement documentation. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (RICE prioritization, customer interview analysis, PRD templates, discovery frameworks, go-to-market strategies) and 'when' ('Use for feature prioritization, user research synthesis, requirement documentation, and product strategy development'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural keywords a product manager would use: 'RICE prioritization', 'customer interview', 'PRD', 'feature prioritization', 'user research', 'go-to-market', 'product strategy', 'requirement documentation'. These cover a good range of terms users would naturally say. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | While it targets product management specifically, the breadth of the skill is very wide—covering prioritization, research, documentation, and strategy. Terms like 'requirement documentation' or 'strategy development' could overlap with general project management or business strategy skills. The scope is so broad it could conflict with more specialized skills in any of these sub-domains. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
35%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill file reads more like a comprehensive PM handbook than a focused skill instruction for Claude. While it has good structure with clear workflows and some executable commands, it is severely bloated with general PM knowledge that Claude already possesses (interview techniques, PRD writing tips, prioritization best practices). The actionable parts (CLI commands, CSV format, script usage) are buried in extensive process documentation that should either be drastically trimmed or moved to reference files.
Suggestions
Cut all general PM advice sections (Best Practices, Common Pitfalls) that Claude already knows, or move them to a reference file - this alone would reduce the file by ~40%
Move the Integration Points table and detailed workflow process steps to reference files, keeping only the tool-specific commands and formats in the main skill
Add error handling guidance for the Python scripts (what happens if CSV format is wrong, what if transcript parsing fails) to improve actionability
Consolidate the Quick Start and Quick Reference sections and focus the main file on the two concrete tools (RICE prioritizer and interview analyzer) with their exact inputs, outputs, and usage patterns
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely verbose for a skill file. Contains extensive best practices, pitfalls tables, integration platform lists, and general PM advice that Claude already knows (e.g., 'Ask why five times', 'Focus on past behavior not future intentions', 'Start with the problem not the solution'). The content reads more like a PM handbook than a concise skill instruction. Much of this could be cut or moved to reference files. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete CLI commands for the two Python scripts (RICE prioritizer and interview analyzer), including CSV input format and command flags. However, much of the content is process guidance (e.g., 'Recruit Participants', 'Review with engineering for feasibility') that is descriptive rather than executable. The actual scripts are referenced but not shown, and many steps are generic PM advice rather than specific instructions. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step workflows are clearly sequenced with numbered steps and visual flow diagrams. Validation checklists are included at key steps (Steps 5-6 in prioritization, Steps 5-6 in discovery). However, the validation steps are mostly generic PM checklists rather than tool-specific verification (e.g., no validation that the CSV format is correct before running the script, no error handling guidance for script failures). | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References external files appropriately (references/prd_templates.md, references/frameworks.md, references/input-output-examples.md) and has a table of contents. However, the main file is far too long with content that should be in reference files (best practices, common pitfalls, integration points table). The input/output examples are correctly deferred but the inline content is bloated. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
f567c61
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.