CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

pulse

Multi-source recency research skill that takes the pulse of any topic across Reddit, Hacker News, the open web, and optionally X/Twitter within a configurable recent window (default 30 days). Forcing intake clarifies topic specificity, angle (trend/sentiment/problems/opportunities/comparison), time window, and platform scope before searching. Returns a synthesized briefing with citations, engagement metrics, and cross-platform pattern analysis. Use when the user requests multi-source recency intelligence on a topic (e.g., 'pulse on [topic]', 'what's happening with [topic]', 'what are people saying about [topic]', 'current conversation about [topic]', 'take the pulse of [topic]', 'trending: [topic]', 'find me info on [topic]'), and for competitor research, trend discovery, tool comparisons, and audience sentiment analysis.

77

Quality

96%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

The risk profile of this skill

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, highly actionable multi-phase workflow with strong validation and feedback loops, and it cleanly separates overview from one-level-deep references. The only weakness is mild redundancy that could be tightened to improve token efficiency.

Suggestions

Remove the Invocation trigger-phrase list from the body since it duplicates the frontmatter description verbatim; reference 'the triggers in the description' instead.

Consolidate the Agent Integrity Rules block with the per-phase rate-limit/retry notes to avoid restating the same discipline twice.

Trim the Anti-Patterns To Reject list to the few items not already enforced inline (e.g., dedup and empty-file rules are covered in the Error Handling table).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Largely efficient and assumes Claude's competence (no generic explanations of what Reddit/HN are), but there is redundancy — the Invocation section re-lists trigger phrases already in the frontmatter, Agent Integrity Rules are restated at phase level, and the 10-item Anti-Patterns list could be trimmed — keeping it just below the lean/5 anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable guidance throughout: concrete endpoints ('reddit.com/search.json', 'hn.algolia.com/api/v1/'), exact query parameters, citation_tracker.py invocations with flags, and a copy-paste bash block for the X export importer. Not below 5: minor placeholders like <topic> are appropriate parameterization, not gaps.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear dependency-ordered sequence (Phase 0 intake → Pre-flight → Phases 1–4 in parallel → Synthesis → Output) with explicit validation checkpoints (three-count audit log, citation discipline, retry policy) and feedback loops (failure → 3s wait → retry once → fallback → 3-consecutive-failures stop), satisfying the batch-operation validation requirement.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is an overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references to real files (references/research_pack_conventions.md, parallel_execution_discipline.md, cross_platform_synthesis.md) and a clear scripts/ table; the inline Agent Integrity Rules summary correctly defers the canon to a reference rather than nesting.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is exemplary: it states concrete capabilities, provides abundant natural trigger phrases, and cleanly answers both what and when, all in third person without padding. It is concise relative to the breadth of capability it conveys.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'takes the pulse of any topic across Reddit, Hacker News, the open web, and optionally X/Twitter', 'forcing intake clarifies topic specificity, angle... time window, and platform scope', and 'returns a synthesized briefing with citations, engagement metrics, and cross-platform pattern analysis' — giving comprehensive, non-abstract coverage.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (multi-source recency research producing a synthesized briefing with citations and cross-platform analysis) and 'when' (an explicit 'Use when...' clause with concrete trigger phrases).

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural-language triggers with synonyms and variations — 'pulse on [topic]', 'what's happening with', 'what are people saying about', 'current conversation about', 'take the pulse of', 'trending:', 'find me info on' — plus use-case tags (competitor research, trend discovery, tool comparisons, audience sentiment).

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (multi-source recency intelligence across named platforms within a time window) with distinctive triggers; only minor overlap risk from the generic phrase 'find me info on [topic]', so it stays at the top anchor.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.