CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

qms-audit-expert

ISO 13485 internal audit expertise for medical device QMS. Covers audit planning, execution, nonconformity classification, and CAPA verification. Use for internal audit planning, audit execution, finding classification, external audit preparation, or audit program management.

93

1.10x
Quality

Pending

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

92%

1.10x

Average score across 6 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Evaluation results

97%

26%

Annual Internal Audit Program Planning

Risk-based audit schedule generation

Criteria
Without context
With context

Script invocation

40%

100%

JSON input file

50%

100%

Correct JSON schema

100%

100%

High-risk processes identified

40%

100%

Medium-risk processes identified

25%

62%

Correct frequency mapping

60%

100%

All ISO 13485 clauses covered

100%

100%

JSON output format

100%

100%

Auditor independence criteria

100%

100%

Audit program metrics

62%

100%

Previous findings considered

100%

100%

Audit dates included

100%

100%

100%

14%

Internal Audit Report — Finding Documentation and Classification

Finding documentation and nonconformity classification

Criteria
Without context
With context

Requirement/Evidence/Gap format

100%

100%

Specific clause references

100%

100%

Objective evidence in Evidence field

100%

100%

Correct Major classification

100%

100%

Correct Minor classification

100%

100%

Correct Observation classification

100%

100%

Decision tree applied

100%

100%

CAPA timeline for Major

0%

100%

CAPA timeline for Minor

0%

100%

No corrective actions in finding

100%

100%

Neutral language used

100%

100%

Findings not combined

100%

100%

Finding log produced

100%

100%

87%

-1%

CAPA Management and Finding Closure

CAPA root cause analysis and finding closure

Criteria
Without context
With context

5-Why or Fishbone for Major

100%

100%

Immediate cause for Minor

100%

100%

Major closure checklist

83%

66%

Closure only after CAPA verified

100%

100%

Closure record template

100%

100%

Evidence references in closure

100%

100%

Major CAPA timeline

50%

62%

Effectiveness verification method

100%

100%

Verification timing for Major

100%

100%

NC-YYYY-XXX finding ID format

100%

100%

Finding log updated

100%

100%

Management review metrics

0%

0%

88%

Internal Audit of the Purchasing Process

Audit execution workflow and evidence collection documentation

Criteria
Without context
With context

Opening meeting documented

100%

100%

Documentation reviewed pre-audit

100%

100%

Closing meeting with preliminary findings

100%

100%

5-day report deadline

100%

100%

Document review evidence fields

100%

100%

Interview evidence fields

100%

100%

Observation evidence fields

0%

0%

Record trace evidence fields

100%

100%

Scope validation

75%

75%

Findings supported by evidence

100%

100%

Audit plan produced

100%

100%

All four evidence methods used

100%

100%

100%

13%

ISO 13485 Re-Certification Audit Preparation Plan

External audit preparation and mock audit protocol

Criteria
Without context
With context

All internal audits completed

100%

100%

Findings closed with effective CAPA

100%

100%

Management review with audit input

100%

100%

Documentation readiness checklist

100%

100%

Personnel readiness checklist

12%

100%

Facility readiness checklist

25%

100%

Mock audit uses qualified auditor

100%

100%

Mock audit covers full scope

100%

100%

Mock audit simulates real conditions

100%

100%

Mock findings documented as real audit

100%

100%

Major and Minor findings addressed first

100%

100%

Management briefed on readiness

100%

100%

Personnel briefed on audit protocol

100%

100%

Documentation reviewed for currency

100%

100%

81%

2%

Classifying a Mixed Bag of Audit Findings

Severity matrix and clause-specific finding classification

Criteria
Without context
With context

Impact vs. occurrence matrix applied

33%

83%

High-impact always Major

100%

100%

Medium-impact + occurrence escalation

80%

90%

Low-impact administrative findings

100%

25%

Clause 5.6 threshold applied

100%

100%

Clause 8.5 threshold applied

75%

62%

Clause 4.2 threshold applied

100%

71%

Clause 8.2.2 threshold applied

100%

100%

Classification rationale documented

80%

100%

Observation not escalated without evidence

100%

37%

Finding ID format

0%

100%

Severity-appropriate CAPA requirement

100%

100%

Repository
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Evaluated
Agent
Claude Code
Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.