ISO 13485 internal audit expertise for medical device QMS. Covers audit planning, execution, nonconformity classification, and CAPA verification. Use for internal audit planning, audit execution, finding classification, external audit preparation, or audit program management.
93
Pending
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
92%
1.10xAverage score across 6 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Risk-based audit schedule generation
Script invocation
40%
100%
JSON input file
50%
100%
Correct JSON schema
100%
100%
High-risk processes identified
40%
100%
Medium-risk processes identified
25%
62%
Correct frequency mapping
60%
100%
All ISO 13485 clauses covered
100%
100%
JSON output format
100%
100%
Auditor independence criteria
100%
100%
Audit program metrics
62%
100%
Previous findings considered
100%
100%
Audit dates included
100%
100%
Finding documentation and nonconformity classification
Requirement/Evidence/Gap format
100%
100%
Specific clause references
100%
100%
Objective evidence in Evidence field
100%
100%
Correct Major classification
100%
100%
Correct Minor classification
100%
100%
Correct Observation classification
100%
100%
Decision tree applied
100%
100%
CAPA timeline for Major
0%
100%
CAPA timeline for Minor
0%
100%
No corrective actions in finding
100%
100%
Neutral language used
100%
100%
Findings not combined
100%
100%
Finding log produced
100%
100%
CAPA root cause analysis and finding closure
5-Why or Fishbone for Major
100%
100%
Immediate cause for Minor
100%
100%
Major closure checklist
83%
66%
Closure only after CAPA verified
100%
100%
Closure record template
100%
100%
Evidence references in closure
100%
100%
Major CAPA timeline
50%
62%
Effectiveness verification method
100%
100%
Verification timing for Major
100%
100%
NC-YYYY-XXX finding ID format
100%
100%
Finding log updated
100%
100%
Management review metrics
0%
0%
Audit execution workflow and evidence collection documentation
Opening meeting documented
100%
100%
Documentation reviewed pre-audit
100%
100%
Closing meeting with preliminary findings
100%
100%
5-day report deadline
100%
100%
Document review evidence fields
100%
100%
Interview evidence fields
100%
100%
Observation evidence fields
0%
0%
Record trace evidence fields
100%
100%
Scope validation
75%
75%
Findings supported by evidence
100%
100%
Audit plan produced
100%
100%
All four evidence methods used
100%
100%
External audit preparation and mock audit protocol
All internal audits completed
100%
100%
Findings closed with effective CAPA
100%
100%
Management review with audit input
100%
100%
Documentation readiness checklist
100%
100%
Personnel readiness checklist
12%
100%
Facility readiness checklist
25%
100%
Mock audit uses qualified auditor
100%
100%
Mock audit covers full scope
100%
100%
Mock audit simulates real conditions
100%
100%
Mock findings documented as real audit
100%
100%
Major and Minor findings addressed first
100%
100%
Management briefed on readiness
100%
100%
Personnel briefed on audit protocol
100%
100%
Documentation reviewed for currency
100%
100%
Severity matrix and clause-specific finding classification
Impact vs. occurrence matrix applied
33%
83%
High-impact always Major
100%
100%
Medium-impact + occurrence escalation
80%
90%
Low-impact administrative findings
100%
25%
Clause 5.6 threshold applied
100%
100%
Clause 8.5 threshold applied
75%
62%
Clause 4.2 threshold applied
100%
71%
Clause 8.2.2 threshold applied
100%
100%
Classification rationale documented
80%
100%
Observation not escalated without evidence
100%
37%
Finding ID format
0%
100%
Severity-appropriate CAPA requirement
100%
100%
967fe01
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.