quality-manager-qmr

Senior Quality Manager Responsible Person (QMR) for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Provides quality system governance, management review leadership, regulatory compliance oversight, and quality performance monitoring per ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2. Use when leading management reviews, setting quality policy and objectives, monitoring quality KPIs and cost of quality, or exercising QMR governance and regulatory oversight responsibilities.

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

—

The risk profile of this skill

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured with sequenced workflows and explicit validation checkpoints, supported by real reference files and templates. It loses points for some inlined content that belongs in references, minor repetition in the Quick Reference sections, and an unreferenced script.

Suggestions

Move the Management Review Input Template and Core Quality KPI tables into the existing reference files, keeping SKILL.md as an overview with 'See:' links to improve progressive disclosure.

Add a concrete usage example for management_review_tracker.py (e.g. a sample command and expected output) rather than only pointing to '--help'.

Either reference scripts/quality_effectiveness_monitor.py in the Tools and References section or remove it from the bundle to avoid an orphaned asset.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Content is mostly efficient using tables, templates, and numbered workflows without explaining basic concepts, but the Quick Reference sections repeat management review inputs/outputs already covered in the workflow and KPI/Culture tables add length that could be trimmed.	4 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete fill-in templates (Management Review Input Summary, Quality Objective Structure), explicit KPI calculations, and a decision tree, but the referenced tracker script is only shown via '--help' rather than with concrete usage examples.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Each workflow (Management Review, KPI Framework, Objectives, Culture, Compliance) has a numbered sequence closing with an explicit 'Validation:' checkpoint, e.g. '8. Validation: All required inputs reviewed; decisions documented with owners and due dates'.	5 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Real one-level-deep references are clearly signaled with 'See:' links and a Tools and References table (management-review-guide.md, quality-kpi-framework.md, management_review_tracker.py all exist), but substantial template and KPI content remains inlined in SKILL.md and scripts/quality_effectiveness_monitor.py is never referenced.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: third-person voice, concrete capabilities, an explicit 'Use when...' clause, and a well-scoped niche tied to ISO 13485. Both what and when are clearly answered with natural trigger terms.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions — 'quality system governance, management review leadership, regulatory compliance oversight, and quality performance monitoring' plus 'setting quality policy and objectives, monitoring quality KPIs and cost of quality' — giving comprehensive coverage of the role's capabilities.	5 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('Provides quality system governance, management review leadership, regulatory compliance oversight, and quality performance monitoring per ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2') and when ('Use when leading management reviews, setting quality policy and objectives...').	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural terms users would say are covered comprehensively — 'management reviews', 'quality policy', 'quality objectives', 'quality KPIs', 'cost of quality', 'regulatory oversight' — with synonyms reinforced by the separate triggers list.	5 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The 'Senior Quality Manager Responsible Person (QMR) for HealthTech and MedTech companies' framing carves a clear niche with distinct QMR/ISO 13485 triggers and minimal overlap with adjacent quality skills.	5 / 5
	Total	20 / 20 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning
relative_links	Relative link issues: 4 suspicious	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Path: ra-qm-team/skills/quality-manager-qmr/SKILL.md
Commit: 19392f7

Reviewed: ~24 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.