CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

quality-manager-qmr

Senior Quality Manager Responsible Person (QMR) for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Provides quality system governance, management review leadership, regulatory compliance oversight, and quality performance monitoring per ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2.

71

1.26x
Quality

35%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

95%

1.26x

Average score across 6 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./ra-qm-team/quality-manager-qmr/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Evaluation results

100%

23%

Semi-Annual Management Review Package Preparation

Management review preparation and tracker script usage

Criteria
Without context
With context

8-section input template

100%

100%

Tracker script executed

100%

100%

Action item ID format

0%

100%

2-week notification timing

100%

100%

All required attendees listed

75%

100%

1-week agenda distribution

37%

100%

Review outputs documented

87%

100%

Metrics in review_data.json

75%

100%

Prior action items tracked

62%

100%

Input readiness by topic

100%

100%

Review period stated

100%

100%

CAPA data included

100%

100%

87%

24%

Quality KPI Framework for New Medical Device Startup

Quality KPI framework with SMART criteria and performance response

Criteria
Without context
With context

SMART criteria applied

0%

0%

Owner per KPI

100%

100%

Escalation criteria per KPI

100%

100%

First Pass Yield target

100%

100%

CAPA targets correct

100%

100%

Complaint Rate target

100%

100%

Customer Satisfaction target

0%

100%

Review frequency by type

0%

50%

Performance Response Matrix

20%

100%

Current-state assessment accuracy

75%

100%

Data source per KPI

100%

100%

NCR and Repeat Finding targets

100%

100%

100%

32%

Annual Quality Planning: Objectives, Cost Analysis, and Initiative Prioritization

Annual quality objectives, cost of quality, and investment prioritization

Criteria
Without context
With context

Objective numbered format

71%

100%

All objective fields present

50%

100%

Supporting initiatives field

40%

100%

Objective validation met

100%

100%

Four CoQ categories

100%

100%

CoQ as % of revenue

37%

100%

Prevention/Appraisal ratio

37%

100%

Failure cost ratio

62%

100%

Prioritization weights used

33%

100%

Scores shown per criterion

100%

100%

Ranked recommendation

100%

100%

Resource requirements field

87%

100%

95%

-2%

Quality Culture Health Check

Quality culture assessment and improvement planning

Criteria
Without context
With context

All 6 dimensions covered

100%

100%

Response rate validation

100%

100%

Bottom 3 dimensions targeted

100%

100%

Low reporting gap addressed correctly

100%

100%

Communication gap addressed correctly

100%

100%

Two-week response window

100%

100%

Results analysis by segment

100%

100%

Leadership visibility action

100%

100%

Actions have owners

100%

100%

5 category survey structure

62%

37%

Confidentiality communicated

100%

100%

92%

11%

Regulatory Change Management and Inspection Preparation

Regulatory compliance monitoring and inspection readiness

Criteria
Without context
With context

All 8 readiness areas checked

100%

100%

Correct gaps identified

100%

100%

90-day process update deadline

0%

90%

Monthly impact assessment

70%

30%

Training verification required

100%

100%

Remediation prioritized for audit

100%

100%

Action owners assigned

100%

100%

Compliance status tracking

100%

100%

Affected processes mapped

100%

100%

Regulatory requirement register reference

0%

100%

Readiness checklist format

100%

100%

100%

35%

QMR Decision Triage and Reporting Governance

QMR escalation decisions and resource allocation authority

Criteria
Without context
With context

Regulatory violation escalated immediately

100%

100%

Safety issue escalated to safety team

40%

100%

Multi-department issue escalated to executive

0%

100%

Single-department issue handled at department level

100%

100%

Equipment request within QMR authority

100%

100%

Consultant within QMR authority

0%

100%

Quality system requires executive approval

100%

100%

Consultant duration escalation

75%

100%

Reporting cadence in governance charter

70%

100%

Authority boundaries documented

75%

100%

Escalation logic documented

66%

100%

Dollar thresholds cited

50%

100%

Repository
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Evaluated
Agent
Claude Code
Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.