Senior Quality Manager Responsible Person (QMR) for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Provides quality system governance, management review leadership, regulatory compliance oversight, and quality performance monitoring per ISO 13485 Clause 5.5.2.
71
35%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
95%
1.26xAverage score across 6 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./ra-qm-team/quality-manager-qmr/SKILL.mdManagement review preparation and tracker script usage
8-section input template
100%
100%
Tracker script executed
100%
100%
Action item ID format
0%
100%
2-week notification timing
100%
100%
All required attendees listed
75%
100%
1-week agenda distribution
37%
100%
Review outputs documented
87%
100%
Metrics in review_data.json
75%
100%
Prior action items tracked
62%
100%
Input readiness by topic
100%
100%
Review period stated
100%
100%
CAPA data included
100%
100%
Quality KPI framework with SMART criteria and performance response
SMART criteria applied
0%
0%
Owner per KPI
100%
100%
Escalation criteria per KPI
100%
100%
First Pass Yield target
100%
100%
CAPA targets correct
100%
100%
Complaint Rate target
100%
100%
Customer Satisfaction target
0%
100%
Review frequency by type
0%
50%
Performance Response Matrix
20%
100%
Current-state assessment accuracy
75%
100%
Data source per KPI
100%
100%
NCR and Repeat Finding targets
100%
100%
Annual quality objectives, cost of quality, and investment prioritization
Objective numbered format
71%
100%
All objective fields present
50%
100%
Supporting initiatives field
40%
100%
Objective validation met
100%
100%
Four CoQ categories
100%
100%
CoQ as % of revenue
37%
100%
Prevention/Appraisal ratio
37%
100%
Failure cost ratio
62%
100%
Prioritization weights used
33%
100%
Scores shown per criterion
100%
100%
Ranked recommendation
100%
100%
Resource requirements field
87%
100%
Quality culture assessment and improvement planning
All 6 dimensions covered
100%
100%
Response rate validation
100%
100%
Bottom 3 dimensions targeted
100%
100%
Low reporting gap addressed correctly
100%
100%
Communication gap addressed correctly
100%
100%
Two-week response window
100%
100%
Results analysis by segment
100%
100%
Leadership visibility action
100%
100%
Actions have owners
100%
100%
5 category survey structure
62%
37%
Confidentiality communicated
100%
100%
Regulatory compliance monitoring and inspection readiness
All 8 readiness areas checked
100%
100%
Correct gaps identified
100%
100%
90-day process update deadline
0%
90%
Monthly impact assessment
70%
30%
Training verification required
100%
100%
Remediation prioritized for audit
100%
100%
Action owners assigned
100%
100%
Compliance status tracking
100%
100%
Affected processes mapped
100%
100%
Regulatory requirement register reference
0%
100%
Readiness checklist format
100%
100%
QMR escalation decisions and resource allocation authority
Regulatory violation escalated immediately
100%
100%
Safety issue escalated to safety team
40%
100%
Multi-department issue escalated to executive
0%
100%
Single-department issue handled at department level
100%
100%
Equipment request within QMR authority
100%
100%
Consultant within QMR authority
0%
100%
Quality system requires executive approval
100%
100%
Consultant duration escalation
75%
100%
Reporting cadence in governance charter
70%
100%
Authority boundaries documented
75%
100%
Escalation logic documented
66%
100%
Dollar thresholds cited
50%
100%
967fe01
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.