Content
58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body sequences the hybrid routing workflow exceptionally well — deterministic classification rules, per-question intake skip logic, retry and override feedback loops, and a failure-mode checklist. However, every referenced bundle file is absent, leaving the script invocations and Reference Docs section pointing at nonexistent paths, and the duplicated SIGNALS listings and overlapping Anti-Patterns/Failure-Modes sections cost tokens without adding guidance.
Suggestions
Ship the three scripts and three reference docs in the bundle, or remove the references and inline the required detail — all six cited paths currently resolve to nothing, which breaks both the Tooling invocations and the Reference Docs section.
Remove the duplicate SIGNALS listing: keep either the Specialist Registry table or the Phase 2 dict, not both, and make scripts/classifier.py the single source of truth (the "kept phrase-for-phrase in sync — drift = bug" note is itself a symptom of the duplication).
Merge "Anti-Patterns Rejected" into the "Failure Modes" table (they cover the same behaviors) and move the version/changelog footer into a maintainer note outside the runtime body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Prose is tight and assumes competence — no concept explanations — but the SIGNALS map is listed twice (the Specialist Registry table and the Phase 2 dict repeat ~60 phrases), "Anti-Patterns Rejected" largely reiterates the "Failure Modes" table, and the footer carries maintainer meta ("Version: 1.1.0", "Build pattern... per the 2026-06 newgen audit") that is time-sensitive and not runtime guidance. Not 4: the duplication and meta sections are more than minor trims; not 2: there is no padding of knowledge Claude already has. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete in form — "scripts/classifier.py --question \"...\" --output json", verbatim intake questions, a templated audit-log block — but the Phase 2 classification block is explicitly pseudocode ("route_to = argmax(score)" over a symbolic SIGNALS dict), and the three scripts it defers to are absent from the bundle, so the commands are not executable as shipped. Fits anchor 3 ("pseudocode instead of executable code; missing key details"); not 4 because the missing scripts leave the core mechanism unusable as written. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-phase workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit stop conditions ("After Q4 (or earlier if dependency skips applied), commit and start Phase 2"), skip rules per question, feedback loops for error recovery ("On failure → wait 3s → retry once → log. After 3 consecutive failures: stop, alert user"), an explicit routing-override loop, and a ten-row Failure Modes checklist. This matches the anchor-5 pattern of sequence + validation + recovery + checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Scored against the actual bundle: all six referenced files — scripts/classifier.py, scripts/routing_transparency_logger.py, scripts/fallback_decomposer.py, references/hybrid_router_architecture.md, references/deterministic_classification_canon.md, references/fallback_workflow_canon.md — are missing from the bundle, so the "Reference Docs" section and every Tooling invocation point at paths that resolve to nothing, and the full SIGNALS map is inlined in the body though it belongs in the script. Not 3: the disclosure structure isn't merely imperfectly signaled, it is unfulfilled — no referenced path can actually be navigated. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |