Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body: runnable commands with sample data, complete input schemas, and four sequenced workflows with verification steps. The only weaknesses are minor — duplicated benchmark values across two sections and missing error-recovery guidance after cross-check steps.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated benchmark targets from the GTM Efficiency Audit workflow (step 4) since the same values are already in the GTM Efficiency Calculator metrics table, and instead point to that table.
Add an error-recovery branch after each cross-check step (e.g., 'If totals don't match, re-export from CRM and re-run' ) to close the validation feedback loop in each workflow.
Consider consolidating the three per-tool Input Schema blocks into a single referenced file or the sample data files, since complete schemas for all three tools inline add ~90 lines to the main body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with executable commands, input schemas, and benchmark tables rather than explanations of known concepts. Not 5: there is minor redundancy — benchmark targets ("Magic Number (>0.75)", "LTV:CAC (>3:1)", "CAC Payback (<18 months)", "Rule of 40 (>40%)") appear both in the GTM Efficiency Calculator table and again in the GTM Efficiency Audit workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Quick Start commands are copy-paste ready against verified real files (e.g., "python scripts/pipeline_analyzer.py --input assets/sample_pipeline_data.json --format text"), every tool has a complete JSON input schema, and concrete thresholds are given (coverage 3-4x, concentration >40%, MAPE rating bands). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each workflow is a clearly numbered sequence with explicit verification checkpoints ("Verify input data", "Cross-check output totals against your CRM source system", "Cross-check actuals against closed-won records"). Not 5: no error-recovery feedback loop is specified for what to do when a cross-check or reconciliation fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md works as an overview with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references: the Reference Documentation table (revops-metrics-guide.md, pipeline-management-framework.md, gtm-efficiency-benchmarks.md) and Templates table all point to files verified to exist, and bulk detail is correctly kept in those bundle files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |