Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is tight, highly actionable, and has an excellent validation-gated workflow, but its progressive-disclosure promise is undercut by missing bundle files (three references and two scripts are referenced but absent from the skill directory).
Suggestions
Ship the referenced bundle files: add references/threat-modeling-guide.md, references/security-architecture-patterns.md, references/cryptography-implementation.md so the References table links resolve.
Provide scripts/threat_modeler.py and scripts/secret_scanner.py (or note them as external/TODO), since the workflow steps invoke them by path and would fail as written.
If the scripts/references are intentionally out-of-scope, replace the bare path references with a short note describing what each provides so the skill is self-sufficient when the files are absent.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, dense body that assumes Claude knows STRIDE/DREAD/DFD; uses tight tables and copy-ready bash snippets with no concept re-explanation, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands with real flags and outputs ("python3 scripts/threat_modeler.py --component ... --json --output threats.json", "python3 scripts/secret_scanner.py /path/to/project --format json --severity high") plus concrete consumption rules, matching the copy-paste-ready anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A 5-step sequence (Scope → Generate → Consume → Sweep → Verification gate) with an explicit validation gate and re-run feedback loop ("Re-run both tools after mitigations land — that re-run is the done signal"), matching the explicit-validation-with-feedback-loops anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is well-signaled and one-level-deep (a "References (load on demand)" table), but none of the referenced bundle files exist (references/, scripts/ are missing), so navigation to threat-modeling-guide.md, the crypto/architecture references, and the two scripts is non-functional. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |