Conciseness

Mostly lean with executable commands and no padding of concepts Claude already knows, but the no-network/no-key safety message is repeated across the intro, step 4, and the Hard rules section. Not a 5 because that repetition could be trimmed into one authoritative statement.

Actionability

Provides copy-paste bash commands with flags and expected outputs ('# -> ./my-agent/payloads/{01-environment,…}.json') for each step, but the referenced scripts (payload_generator.py, launch_script_writer.py, payload_validator.py) are not present in the bundle. Not a 5 because the commands depend on scripts that are not verifiably bundled.

Workflow Clarity

The five-step sequence is clearly ordered with an explicit validation checkpoint (step 3, 'FAIL blocks… Fix and re-run'), a fix-and-rerun feedback loop, and a foreground-poll gate before declaring success ('Watch the first poll foreground before declaring success'). This satisfies the validation requirement for a risky launch operation, so the destructive-operation cap does not apply.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is well-sectioned with a Tools index and inline citations ('Cite: cma-primitives.md'), but the referenced scripts and cma-primitives.md are not bundled — the one-level-deep references do not resolve. Not a 4 because missing reference targets are more than a minor organization gap; not a 2 because the in-body structure and signaling are genuinely present.

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions — 'turn a validated build sheet into exact API payloads and a resumable BYOK curl launch script, then launch (environment → agent → session → kickoff)' — covering generation, scripting, validation, and launch comprehensively. Not a 4 because coverage of the launch scope is complete rather than having minor gaps.

Completeness

Explicitly states both what it does (build sheet → payloads + launch script → launch in sequence) and when to use it ('Use when the user says…'), with concrete trigger phrases. Not a 4 because both what and when are concrete and explicit rather than imprecisely stated.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user phrasings as explicit triggers — 'launch it', 'deploy the agent', 'create the agent now' — plus an orchestrator routing cue (phase=stage-launch), giving strong synonym coverage. File extensions are not applicable to this domain, so the anchor-5 synonym criterion is met.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Has a clear niche (Phase 2 launch) and explicitly disambiguates ('Distinct from interview (planning) and grade-iterate (the outcome loop)'), but as the middle phase of a three-phase pipeline it carries inherent overlap risk with sibling phase skills. Not a 5 because those sibling phases are closely related skills a user could plausibly route to by mistake.