Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a compact, well-structured overview with executable commands and real script references, supported by clear hard rules. Weakest spots are the slightly vague Finalize step and validation expressed as constraints rather than explicit inline checkpoints.
Suggestions
Make the Finalize step fully executable by giving the exact goal_state.py invocation (with script path) and a concrete check for NEXT-DIRECTIONS.md currency.
Convert the Hard rules into an inline validation checkpoint (e.g., verify the overview regenerated and phase advanced) within the workflow sequence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with tight bash commands and short hard rules, but the opening framing ('The explicit close-out. Confirm what's live...') and the supplementary forcing-question library add minor tokens that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The three main workflow commands are concrete, copy-paste ready bash with full flags and existing script paths, but the 'Finalize' step ('Ensure NEXT-DIRECTIONS.md is current... then goal_state.py advance') is less specific, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence is present with verification guidance in the Hard rules ('read it from the sheet + goal state, never assert primitives that weren't created'), though checkpoints are stated as constraints rather than inline validate-then-proceed steps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into Workflow, Hard rules, Forcing-question library, and Tools sections, with one-level-deep references to real bundle scripts (primitives_inventory.py, overview_page.py, upgrade_suggester.py) that match the actual file listing. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |