Name: x-twitter-growth
Rating: 65.60000000000001 (1 reviews)
Author: alirezarezvani

x-twitter-growth

X/Twitter growth engine for building audience, crafting viral content, and analyzing engagement. Use when the user wants to grow on X/Twitter, write tweets or threads, analyze their X profile, research competitors on X, plan a posting strategy, or optimize engagement. Complements social-content (generic multi-platform) with X-specific depth: algorithm mechanics, thread engineering, reply strategy, profile optimization, and competitive intelligence via web search.

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.gemini/skills/x-twitter-growth/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is x-twitter-growth in alirezarezvani/claude-skills

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable skill body, but it is undermined by five referenced scripts/*.py files that are absent from the bundle, and by missing validation checkpoints in the workflow. Fixing the dangling script references and adding explicit verify steps would lift the weaker dimensions.

Suggestions

Either add the five referenced scripts (profile_auditor.py, competitor_analyzer.py, tweet_composer.py, content_planner.py, growth_tracker.py) to a scripts/ bundle, or remove the commands and 'Scripts' table and replace them with inline, self-contained guidance.

Add explicit validation/verification checkpoints after key steps — e.g. after content_planner.py output or a profile audit, a 'Review the generated plan / audit results and confirm X' step.

Consider splitting the large inline sections (Algorithm Mechanics tables, full Growth Playbook) into one-level-deep reference files so SKILL.md reads as an overview with clearly signaled pointers.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly lean and actionable via checklists, tables, and structural code blocks, with only minor over-explanation (e.g. 'signals amateur', 'Common Pitfalls' partly restating earlier guidance).	4 / 5
Actionability	Highly concrete with exact commands, search syntax, thread structures, and cadence tables; falls short of 5 because the five referenced scripts/*.py files do not actually exist, so the commands are not copy-paste runnable as written.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear sequenced 6-step process with checklists is present, but validation/verification checkpoints are largely implicit (no 'verify output' after calendar generation or audits), keeping it at the validation-gap anchor.	3 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Reasonable section structure, but the body inlines content that could live in separate files and references scripts/ paths that do not exist as bundle files — references are present but not real/valid.	3 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description with explicit what/when triggers and clear distinctiveness from sibling skills. The only gap is minor: a few natural X-growth synonyms (followers, replies) are not enumerated.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions — 'building audience, crafting viral content, and analyzing engagement' plus 'write tweets or threads, analyze their X profile, research competitors on X, plan a posting strategy, or optimize engagement' — with comprehensive coverage; uses third-person voice.	5 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both 'what' (growth engine for building audience, crafting viral content, analyzing engagement) and 'when' ('Use when the user wants to grow on X/Twitter, write tweets or threads...') with concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Strong natural trigger phrases users would say ('grow on X/Twitter, write tweets or threads, analyze their X profile, research competitors') with good synonym coverage, but a few natural X terms (e.g. 'followers', 'reply') are absent.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Clear X-specific niche and explicit boundary guidance ('Complements social-content... with X-specific depth') distinguishes it from sibling skills, giving minimal conflict risk.	5 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 11 missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Path: .gemini/skills/x-twitter-growth/SKILL.md
Commit: 19392f7

Reviewed: ~14 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.