Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strong, highly actionable skill body with executable examples, explicit verification steps, and well-organized one-level-deep references. Its main weakness is density: the label-association and convenience-vs-composed prose pack edge cases into long run-on paragraphs that would read better tightened or split into the references.
Suggestions
Break the long label/aria-association paragraph in 'Common props' into a short default-behavior statement plus a compact edge-case table (or move the edge cases to references/api.md), keeping only the common path inline.
Split the dense 'Convenience vs composed' paragraph into a short rule list, moving the 'what happens when props are given to the wrong tier' edge cases into a small table or reference note.
Promote the references to a dedicated short section (e.g., '## References' with labeled links to api.md and patterns.md) so navigation to the detail files is signalled from the structure rather than one sentence at the end of the validation section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and free of padding or basic-concept explanations, but the ~23-line label/aria-association paragraph and parts of 'Convenience vs composed' are run-on edge-case walls ('A range Slider points the for at its low thumb and also puts the label at the start of both thumbs' names through aria-labelledby...') that could be tightened or trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: auto-wrap vs composed snippets, a complete copy-paste SignupForm with state and validation, concrete toast.success('Demo booked') / await dialog.confirm({...}) usage, prop tables with types, and a runnable command (pnpm storybook) — the common cases are covered. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The skill progresses coherently (composition → inventory → props → convenience-vs-composed → validation pattern → post-submit → visual verification) and closes with an explicit validation step (render and inspect, with the renderToString fallback and 'say the visual pass is owed') plus a checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview with one-level-deep references (references/api.md for per-component props, references/patterns.md for a full multi-field form) that exist and deliver the promised depth. Minor gaps: the reference pointers appear only once in prose near the end rather than a dedicated navigation section, and reference-grade aria/label edge-case detail is inlined in the body. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |