Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean role skill with actionable per-layer procedures and a sensible progressive-disclosure split into reference files. Its weaknesses are missing validation/feedback steps in the feature and modification workflows (which involve database migrations) and small navigation defects: incorrect reference link paths and an orphaned standards.md bundle file.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint to the feature and modification SOPs (e.g., a final step: run the module's pytest suite and Alembic migration check before declaring done) so the DB-touching workflows have feedback loops and workflow clarity is no longer capped at 3.
Fix the reference link paths: the body points to "backend-expert/references/*.md" but the files live at "references/*.md" relative to SKILL.md — correct the links so navigation works.
Either reference "standards.md" from the knowledge-base section (it covers typing and code standards relevant to every task) or remove it from the bundle so all reference files are discoverable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is directive and lean — every section gives instructions (file paths, layer conventions, banned patterns) with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Minor trims are possible (persona framing "Actúas como un Arquitecto Backend Senior", the "Directiva Cero"/"Código como Documentación" branding), which keeps it at the 4 anchor rather than the fully lean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout: exact doc paths ("docs/domains/INDEX.md"), concrete file patterns ("repositories/[nombre]_repository.py"), and specific syntax rules ("session.execute(select(Model))", soft delete via "deleted_at"). It falls short of the 5 anchor because some steps stay high-level ("Genera la migración de Alembic" with no command, "Crea los DTOs" with no schema example). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three SOPs are clearly sequenced (Inside-Out for features, code-first for modifications, Outside-In for bug fixes), but only the bug-fix flow has a validation checkpoint ("Red Test" reproduction, regression-test verification). The feature and modification SOPs include database migrations with no test or verification step, and the rubric caps workflow clarity at 3 when DB-touching workflows lack feedback loops — so this cannot score 4 despite the good sequencing. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with well-signaled, purpose-mapped references ("Estructura y DDD", "Base de Datos", "Testing") that are one level deep, and all three referenced files exist in the bundle. Minor organization gaps keep it below 5: the links point to "backend-expert/references/..." while the files actually live at "references/..." (broken relative paths), and the bundled "standards.md" is never referenced from the overview. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |