Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, fully executable reference for Tessl tile management: concrete commands throughout, a clear prioritization rule, and a workflow with a verify step. The only gap is the absence of any error-recovery guidance for the install path, which keeps workflow clarity just below top marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~55-line body is lean with zero concept explanations and no padding; the Commands section is bare executable invocations and the Notes carry only non-obvious facts (host vs Docker, tessl.json vs .tessl/). Every token earns its place, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | All commands are copy-paste ready with placeholders ('tessl search <library-name>', 'tessl install <tile-id> --agent claude-code --yes') and the workflow gives a fully concrete worked example ('tessl search react', 'tessl install react-v19 --agent claude-code --yes'), matching the score-5 anchor for executable coverage of common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Typical Workflow gives a clear search → install → verify sequence with an explicit checkpoint ('Verify it is installed: tessl list'), but there is no error-recovery guidance (e.g., what to do when search returns nothing or install fails), fitting the score-4 anchor ('most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps') rather than the feedback-loop-driven score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A compact single-file skill needing no external references, with well-organized sections (Priority Rule, Typical Workflow, Commands, Notes) and no content that belongs in a separate file — meets the simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |