Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, action-oriented workflow with strong sequencing, concrete templates, and explicit error-recovery and approval loops. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: a large amount of reference-grade material (prompt slot architecture, eval policy, recovery matrix, cost budget) is inlined in SKILL.md with no bundle files to offload it, which is acceptable for a self-contained skill but leaves the overview heavier than ideal.
Suggestions
Extract the prompt slot architecture (Step 5), error recovery matrix (Step 7), and eval policy (Step 8) into a references/ file (e.g. references/agentic-design-details.md) and link from the body, so SKILL.md stays a lean overview with one-level-deep references.
Add an explicit validate-then-proceed checkpoint between Step 4 (tools sequence) and Step 5 (prompt slots) — e.g. confirm forbidden tools are listed before defining cache slots — to lift workflow clarity toward 5.
Tighten the Anti-patterns section to entries not already implied by the slot/cache rules, removing redundancy with Step 5 to improve token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and largely token-efficient — tables, ASCII diagrams, and code blocks deliver guidance without explaining concepts Claude already knows. A few sections restate obvious constraints (e.g. the Anti-patterns list partly duplicates slot rules), which keeps it just below a 5 but well above the 3 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready templates: the Turn 1/Turn 2 transcript, slot-layout block, state-machine diagram, and populated tables for tools, recovery, and eval policy. It is not a 5 because several items are schemas/templates to fill rather than fully executable commands (e.g. 'Compactar (system + last 3 turns)' is guidance, not runnable code). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Thirteen clearly sequenced steps with explicit checkpoints (Step 1 scope validation, Step 11 delta-spec escalation, Step 12 iterate-until-approval loop) and a recovery matrix provide strong sequencing. It does not reach 5 because several steps lack an explicit validate-then-proceed gate, though the Step 12 approval loop and error-recovery table cover most feedback needs. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle files exist, and the body inlines all guidance (slot architecture, recovery matrix, eval policy, cost budget) in a single ~245-line file with clear section headers but no one-level-deep references to separate files. Per the simple-skill guidance this could reach 5, but the volume of inlined reference material (slot architecture, eval policy tables) that would benefit from separate files lands it at the 3 anchor of 'some structure, content that should be separate is inline'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |