Conciseness

The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence — no concept explanations, just tool lists, exact Globs, and tables — with templates correctly externalized. Not 5: the session-folder rule is stated three times ("Never write to `/tmp`, `docs/flow-specs/`, or `docs/ui-specs/`" appears in the Session Folder section and again in Phase 6, and each Output A–D repeats the location the folder tree already declared), so not every token earns its place. Not 3: there is no padded explanation of things Claude already knows, only minor repetition that could be trimmed.

Actionability

Fully copy-paste ready: exact Glob patterns ("frontend/src/app/(main)/[tenantId]/(dashboard)/**/page.tsx"), exact Read/Grep targets ("Read: frontend/src/components/shared/layout/app-sidebar.tsx"), executable bash ("mkdir -p \"docs/ux-sessions/$SESSION/prototype\"", "python3 -m http.server 8888 -d \"docs/ux-sessions/$SESSION/prototype/\""), and a concrete per-phase output format including an example ASCII journey diagram and sidebar before/after. Specific examples cover the common cases.

Workflow Clarity

A clear 6-phase sequence with tools per phase and explicit user-confirmation gates after each phase ("**Gate:** Present the map and ask...", "**Gate:** User confirms prototype reflects what they want"), plus Edge Cases and Common Mistakes tables. Not 5: the top deprecation banner ("Outputs nuevos van a `docs/projects/active/PI-N/sprints/SN/stories/{id}/mockups/`") directly contradicts the body's session-folder rule ("All outputs land in the session folder... `docs/ux-sessions/{SESSION_SLUG}/FLOW-SPEC.md`"), leaving the authoritative output destination ambiguous mid-workflow. Not 3: sequence and validation checkpoints are otherwise complete and explicit.

Progressive Disclosure

References are one level deep, clearly signaled, and loaded on demand at the right phase ("Load `references/journey-template.md`" in Phase 2, `navigation-patterns.md` in Phase 4, `html-prototype-system.md` in Phase 5, `flow-spec-template.md`/`ui-spec-template.md` in Phase 6), and all four in-bundle files exist with matching purpose. Not 5: two of the six referenced paths do not resolve inside this bundle ("`.claude/skills/ux-disruptivo/references/ascii-mockup-guide.md`" and `ui-spec-template.md` from ux-disruptivo), so they cannot be verified or loaded within the skill itself. Not 3: bulk material is properly split out and navigation to it is easy.

Specificity

"Audits all routes and sidebar entries, maps user journeys across studios, detects orphaned features and dead-end flows, proposes navigation improvements with ASCII diagrams, generates clickable multi-page HTML prototypes on localhost:8888, and outputs FLOW-SPEC.md plus per-screen UI-SPEC updates" — six concrete, verifiable actions covering the full audit-to-deliverable pipeline, matching the 'multiple specific concrete actions; comprehensive coverage' anchor. Not 4: coverage is end-to-end with no gaps of consequence.

Completeness

Explicit what ("Audits all routes and sidebar entries... outputs FLOW-SPEC.md plus per-screen UI-SPEC updates") followed by an explicit when ("Use when the user asks about navigation coherence, user flows, journey mapping, orphaned features, dead-end screens...") plus a dedicated trigger list. Clearly and explicitly answers both what AND when with concrete trigger phrases; the missing-'Use when' cap does not apply.

Trigger Term Quality

"Triggers: 'flujo de usuario', 'navegación', 'journey', 'user flow', 'sidebar', 'rutas huérfanas', 'orphaned routes', 'dead end', 'flow audit', 'navigation audit'... 'no encuentro', 'dónde está', 'reorganizar navegación'" — comprehensive natural phrasings with synonyms in both English and the user's actual language (Spanish), including how a frustrated user would literally ask ('no encuentro', 'dónde está'). Matches the 'comprehensive coverage of natural terms including synonyms' anchor; not 4 because nothing common is missing.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Interactive cross-feature navigation architect for Nicolify" with niche triggers like "rutas huérfanas", "orphaned routes", "dead end", "flow audit" carves a clear role distinct from screen-designer skills. Not 5: broad triggers such as "sidebar", "navegación", and "discoverability" overlap with the sibling ux-disruptivo/ux-ui design skills (sidebar work could reasonably be screen design), so it is 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk with closely related skills'. Not 3: the orphan/dead-end/flow-audit vocabulary is strongly distinctive of this skill alone.