Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, highly actionable workflow with strong sequencing and validation gates appropriate to a destructive/iterative design process. It could tighten minor redundancy and would benefit from moving some reference material into bundle files.
Suggestions
De-duplicate rules that appear both inline in the workflow steps and in the Anti-patterns section to recover conciseness points.
Move the detailed 02-design-ui.md template checklist into a references/ file and link to it from Step 4 to strengthen progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is terse and imperative with tables, code blocks, and output templates, assuming Claude's competence without explaining concepts; minor tightening possible (some rules duplicated between inline steps and the Anti-patterns section) keeps it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete file paths, an exact runnable command ('python3 -m http.server 8888'), ready-to-use output templates, and a precise YAML checkpoint format — copy-paste ready guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps with explicit validation checkpoints (scope gate, 'STOP. Escala /po', iterate until 'está bien', optional chrome-devtools-verify) and feedback loops for error recovery on scope and design-system violations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file structure with clear sections and one-level-deep references to templates and skills (no nested refs), but no bundle files exist and a few reference paths are inline rather than separated into reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |