Conciseness

The body is almost entirely commands, templates, and decision rules — git fundamentals are delegated to SSoT rules files rather than re-explained. Not 5 because guardrails are stated three times (prompt template HARD rules, 'Cuándo NO usar', and 'Anti-patterns', e.g. "❌ Permitir Haiku ejecutar `git pull` / `--force` / `--no-verify`" restates the template), which could be trimmed to two mentions; not 3 because there is no concept re-teaching or padded prose.

Actionability

Fully executable throughout: exact audit commands (git status --short, branch check, git log -oneline -3), Conventional Commits spec with subject char limit and type list, a complete Agent({...}) spawn call, a verbatim worker prompt template with HEREDOC commit syntax and numbered steps, and an exact last-line report protocol. Copy-paste ready with specific examples covering the common cases.

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1-4 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: branch ≠ development → STOP, secret-pattern match → escalate, clean tree → no spawn, post-stage verification that OTHERS files are 'still unstaged + intact', pre-commit hook failure → fix and re-spawn with a new commit, non-fast-forward → STOP with no pull, and a final git log confirmation. The destructive/batch-operation cap does not apply because validation is comprehensive.

Progressive Disclosure

Good internal structure with clearly signaled, one-level-deep SSoT references at both the top ("SSoT guardrails: `.claude/rules/git-haiku-delegation.md`") and bottom (Referencias section with labeled per-file purposes). Not 5 because the skill is a monolithic ~135-line file — the full ~40-line prompt template is inlined in SKILL.md and no bundle files exist to split detail into; not 3 because what references exist are clearly signaled and content placement is otherwise appropriate.

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions — "Stage + commit + push", "Orchestrator (Opus) prepara plan; Haiku ejecuta git workflow con guardrails verbatim" — covering the full workflow with only minor gaps (guardrail contents left to the body). Falls below 5 because a share of the description goes to meta-pattern details (token-cheap, Haiku, origen date) rather than broader action coverage, and above 3 because more than 1-2 actions are named.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both questions: what ("Stage + commit + push delegation a Haiku worker... Orchestrator prepara plan; Haiku ejecuta git workflow") and when ("Activa: '/commit-push', 'commitea y sube', 'commit haiku', 'commit y push', 'commit + push'") with concrete trigger phrases. The 'Activa:' clause is explicit trigger guidance, so the missing-'Use when' cap does not apply.

Trigger Term Quality

"Activa: '/commit-push', 'commitea y sube', 'commit haiku', 'commit y push', 'commit + push'" provides comprehensive natural trigger phrases including synonyms in both Spanish and English, matching the anchor's requirement for synonym coverage. Nothing material is missing from the terms a user would naturally say for this request.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (Haiku-delegated git commit/push workflow) with distinct triggers like 'commit haiku' and '/commit-push'. Not 5 because generic phrases like 'commit + push' could plausibly match a non-delegation git skill; not 3 because the delegation framing and trigger set are well differentiated from typical git skills.