Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered instruction body: an ordered SOP with real validation gates and stop conditions, executable commands and paths throughout, worked placement examples, a troubleshooting table, and detail correctly pushed into a real one-level-deep reference bundle. The only weaknesses are duplicated references across the SOP, Referencias, and Project invariants sections, which slightly inflate length and split navigation.
Suggestions
Consolidate the runtime-quality-checklist and playwright-expert mentions: keep the gate directive in the SOP step and reduce the Project invariants entry to a bare pointer, removing the duplicated detail lists (useEffect deps, stale closures, Clerk auth, etc.).
Merge the '## Referencias (lee solo cuando necesites)' and '## Project invariants (read on demand)' sections into a single annotated reference list so each file appears exactly once and navigation has one obvious entry point.
Consider trimming the long inline scaffold command path (e.g., 'run scripts/scaffold_feature.py from this skill's directory') and the parenthetical history notes (e.g., 'SSoT migrada 2026-05-04', 'origen S4 PI-1') that add tokens without guiding the current task.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, imperative, and strictly project-specific — it never explains concepts Claude already knows — but it duplicates content: the runtime-quality-checklist is detailed in both SOP step 7 ("Cubre: useEffect deps, stale closures, routing tenantId, mock anti-patterns, live verification gate") and the Project invariants section, and the playwright-expert pointer appears twice with overlapping parentheticals. This is minor trimmable duplication (anchor 4), not the unnecessary explanation or padding of anchor 3. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully executable: exact scaffold command ("python .claude/skills/frontend-expert/scripts/scaffold_feature.py <nombre-en-kebab-case> --layer features --path frontend/src"), run commands ("npm run test:e2e:smoke", "docker compose up -d"), real file paths for every reference, a component template, and two worked examples that map a natural-language request to concrete file locations. Copy-paste ready and covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step SOP is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints: TDD red gate ("El test debe fallar (RED)"), a stop-and-confirm scaffold gate ("Detente si el módulo no existe en INDEX — propón nombre y propósito, espera confirmación"), a mandatory pre-commit/pre-audit checklist, a live-verification gate before shipping, and an escalation fallback ("Si dev-app no disponible → escalate Chris staging gate manual"). This matches the anchor-5 feedback-loop pattern. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | All referenced bundle files exist (14 reference docs, scaffold script, component template), references are one level deep and clearly signaled, and the body stays at overview altitude. However, navigation is split across three places — inline step links, the "## Referencias (lee solo cuando necesites)" section, and "## Project invariants (read on demand)" — with overlapping entries (e.g., runtime-quality-checklist, frontend-quality), which is the minor organization gap of anchor 4 rather than the easy single-entry navigation of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |