Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, highly actionable, and well-sequenced with an explicit adversarial validation checkpoint, but it inlines sizable output-template schemas that would be better placed in separate reference files.
Suggestions
Move the full PROJECT-MAP.md / TECH-DEBT.md / STARTER-KIT-PLAN.md markdown templates into files under ./references/ and link to them, keeping only a compact schema sketch inline in SKILL.md.
Add a short 'Validation' note to Phase 9-11 (e.g. confirm generated files are non-empty and parseable) to complement the Phase 12 adversarial pass on detection claims.
List the bundle files you expect (scripts/generate_project_map.py, reference templates) in the Referencias section with explicit one-level-deep links so navigation is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and code-forward with little conceptual padding; phases are short bash snippets and output templates rather than prose explaining concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Phases 1-8 give copy-paste-ready bash (grep/find/-f tests) and Phase 9-11 provide concrete output schemas, so the guidance is fully executable across the common detection and generation cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eleven phases are explicitly sequenced, with Phase 12 acting as an adversarial validation checkpoint and explicit branching ('blocking' -> STOP, 'partial' -> continue), satisfying the validation/feedback-loop requirement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is well-organized by phase headers, but the large inline output templates (PROJECT-MAP.md, TECH-DEBT.md, STARTER-KIT-PLAN.md schemas) are inlined rather than split into separate reference files, and the no-bundle-file condition keeps it from the top anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |