Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A strongly actionable, well-sequenced workflow skill: executable scripts, explicit decision rationale formats, validation guards, and a ratification loop. Its main weaknesses are inline template walls that belong in reference files (no bundle files are provided), undefined scaffold variables, and a couple of soft validation gaps (kit-missing warning without exit, no post-scaffold verification).
Suggestions
Move the Phase 2 decision template and the Phase 4 PROJECT-MAP template into reference files (e.g. references/tech-decision-template.md and references/project-map-template.md) and point to them from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Define or explicitly derive $BACKEND_LANG and $FRONTEND_FRAMEWORK from Phase 2 decisions before the scaffold script, so the Phase 3 block is copy-paste executable as written.
Harden validation: exit (not just warn) when the method kit is missing in Step 0, and add a post-scaffold check (e.g. verifying key directories/files exist) before 'git add . && git commit'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and directive — interview batches, decision templates, an executable scaffold script — with almost no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Not 5 because the Phase 2 decision template and Phase 4 PROJECT-MAP template run long inline and the Referencias section partly duplicates information; not 3 because there is no genuinely unnecessary explanation, just minor trimming opportunities. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, mostly executable guidance: a runnable Step 0 verification script, a full scaffold bash block, exact template formats, and phase-by-phase instructions. Not 5 because the scaffold script references $BACKEND_LANG and $FRONTEND_FRAMEWORK without ever defining them, and {razón}/{PROJECT_NAME} placeholders require assembly — minor gaps from copy-paste ready; not 3 because the vast majority is directly executable rather than pseudocode. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0-5 are clearly sequenced with a Step 0 empty-repo guard that exits on risk and an explicit Phase 2 ratification loop ('Loop hasta Chris ratifica todas las decisions'), plus an Anti-patterns checklist. Not 5 because a missing method kit only echoes a warning (no exit), and there is no post-scaffold verification that files landed before the initial commit; not 3 because checkpoints are present for the risky pre-state even if minor validation gaps remain. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section structure is clear (phases, anti-patterns, cost guardrails, referencias), but no bundle files exist and roughly 150 lines of templates — the Phase 2 decision format and the Phase 4 PROJECT-MAP — are inlined when they clearly belong in separate reference files the skill could point to. Matches 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline'; not 4 because the split opportunity is substantial, not 2 because structure and navigation are otherwise good. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |