Conciseness

The body is dense and lean — tables, code-block templates, no explanations of concepts Claude already knows — but the engine-vs-brand-extension scope rules are stated twice (the split table at the top and again under 'Anti cross-module pollution'), and dated context like 'Post single-project reorg 2026-05-15' sits outside any deprecated/old-patterns section. Minor trimming instances keep it below the lean 5 anchor.

Actionability

Every step gives copy-paste-ready material: a turn-by-turn transcript example with real tool calls, an ASCII state machine, a tools table with concrete signatures and side-effects, a slot layout with TTLs and a forbidden-prefix list, an error-recovery matrix, an eval policy block, a cost budget, and a checkpoint YAML — fully executable guidance for an instruction-only skill.

Workflow Clarity

Thirteen clearly sequenced steps with scope validation up front (Step 1 checks the agentic_contract and escalates if unclear), explicit feedback loops (Step 12 'Loop hasta aprobación', Step 11 delta-spec → /po re-ratification), and a ratification checkpoint with state transition. Matches the anchor with explicit validation steps and error-recovery loops.

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, and the ~290-line body is well-sectioned with headers where every table/template is working guidance rather than bulk reference material. However, some reference-style content (slot architecture examples, the /po-ux comparison table) could live in separate files to keep SKILL.md a leaner overview — good structure with minor organization gaps.

Specificity

The description enumerates multiple concrete actions — 'Toma 01-spec.md (de /po) y produce 02-design-agentic.md ... con: turn-by-turn happy path, state machine agente, tools sequence, prompt slot architecture, voice constraints, error recovery, eval policy (personas+rubrics+pass^k), cost/latency budget, observabilidad' — covering the skill's full output comprehensively, matching the 'multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.

Completeness

Both questions are explicitly answered: the 'what' is concrete (designs conversational flows, produces 02-design-agentic.md with nine named sections, writes delta-spec.md, transitions story state) and the 'when' is explicit with concrete trigger phrases ('Activa cuando user dice: ...'). This matches the top anchor exactly.

Trigger Term Quality

It lists natural phrases a user would actually say plus the slash command: "Activa cuando user dice: '/ux-agentico', 'diseñemos el flujo conversacional', 'cómo conversa el agente', 'flujo del copilot', 'turn-by-turn', 'experiencia agéntica'" — comprehensive coverage including synonyms for the domain.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Diseña FLUJOS CONVERSACIONALES (no UI tradicional)' explicitly carves out a distinct niche from UI-design skills, and triggers like 'turn-by-turn' and 'flujo conversacional' are unlikely to fire for a standard CRUD/UI skill — a clear niche with minimal conflict risk.