CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

alerts

Create and manage price alerts for prediction markets

54

Quality

61%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./src/skills/bundled/alerts/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is concise and actionable command reference documentation with good structure, but the destructive delete path lacks a validation/confirmation checkpoint and there is minor duplication between the Commands and Alert Types sections.

Suggestions

Add an explicit confirmation step before '/alert delete' (e.g. confirm the alert-id and show its details before removing) to satisfy validation requirements for destructive operations.

Consolidate the Commands and Alert Types sections to remove duplicated '/alert' syntax examples and tighten token usage.

Specify the alert-id format and the exact output of '/alerts' so the list/delete flow is fully executable without inference.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean with inline-commented commands and almost no over-explanation, but the Commands section partially duplicates the Alert Types section, leaving minor redundancy that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Commands are concrete and copy-paste ready with worked examples covering common cases, but minor gaps remain (e.g. alert-id format, what /alerts returns), so it is mostly rather than fully executable guidance.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Commands are clearly organized but the destructive '/alert delete' operation has no confirmation or validation step; per the rubric, missing validation for destructive operations caps workflow clarity at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The single file is well-organized into Commands, Alert Types, and Examples with no nested references, but at ~80 lines with some duplication it slightly exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill threshold that would merit a 5.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states a specific, distinctive capability but stops short of providing trigger guidance or natural-language cues. Adding a 'Use when...' clause with user-facing phrases would raise completeness and trigger-term quality.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks to be notified, alerted, or tracked on prediction-market price moves.'

Expand action coverage beyond 'create and manage' to concrete verbs like 'list, delete, and trigger' to reflect the skill's actual scope.

Include natural synonyms users say ('notify me', 'alert me when', 'track this market') to improve trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('price alerts for prediction markets') and two actions ('Create and manage'), but 'manage' is generic and coverage is not comprehensive, matching the anchor for a clear what with 1-2 concrete actions.

3 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear ('Create and manage price alerts for prediction markets') but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which per the rubric caps completeness at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes relevant terms ('price alerts', 'prediction markets') but misses natural user phrasings like 'notify me', 'alert me when', or 'track price', so keyword coverage has gaps rather than being comprehensive.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The prediction-market price-alert niche is specific and unlikely to conflict with unrelated skills, though the absence of explicit trigger phrases keeps it just below the clearly-distinctive anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
alsk1992/CloddsBot
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.